Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tightly written, highly actionable skill body: concrete examples for all three tools, an explicit proposal sequence, and a complexity-based scaling table, all without explaining concepts Claude already knows. Organization is clear with no deep reference nesting.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it never explains what a diff or ASCII diagram is, and every section (tools, structure, scaling, good/bad) earns its place rather than padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives fully concrete, copy-paste-ready templates: real fenced diff syntax, an explicit ASCII character set, a comparison-table format, and an 'Ask' line template ('Should I proceed with [recommendation], or prefer [alternative]?'). | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Proposal Structure lays out a clear 1–5 sequence and the Scaling-by-Complexity table maps scope to what to show; this is a communication skill with no destructive operation, so the missing-validation cap does not apply. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | It is a single, well-organized file with clear section headers and only a one-level reference to writing-voice; no bundle files exist and there is no nested-reference chain. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |