Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tightly written coordination skill with an exemplary concise, unpadded style and a clearly sequenced workflow with genuine validation checkpoints and error-recovery paths. It falls slightly short on actionability (no concrete tool entrypoints or artifact locations, some strategy-level directives) and on progressive disclosure, since all five referenced sibling skills live outside the bundle and could not be verified.
Suggestions
Name the concrete computer-use entrypoints and evidence/artifact locations (e.g. where screenshots and task notes should be recorded) instead of deferring with 'the available computer-use tools' and 'existing task notes or evidence locations', so an agent can act without guessing.
Add one short worked example of a single wave (observation → delegated change → re-exercised journey → outcome) to ground abstract directives like 'Hunt for the owner, invariant, or smaller promise that makes a family of complexity unnecessary'.
The five linked sibling skills (../delegate-claude/SKILL.md, ../consult-claude/SKILL.md, ../post-implementation-review/SKILL.md, ../adversarial-review/SKILL.md, ../collapse-pass/SKILL.md) are not part of this bundle and could not be verified; either confirm they always ship alongside this skill or inline a one-line fallback for when a linked skill is unavailable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense, directive prose with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows — e.g. 'A screenshot cannot prove persistence or native hardware behavior' and 'A running worker's newer code is not evidence about the app currently open in the browser' are sharp, earned tokens. Every sentence instructs; nothing could be cut without losing guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill the guidance is mostly concrete: journey cases are enumerated ('switching items during an operation, interrupting and retrying, closing and reopening'), delegation inputs are named ('baseline, raw evidence, affected consumers, allowed changes, and a bounded stop condition'), and a resume checklist is given. But no commands or tool entrypoints are provided ('Use the available computer-use tools and their documented entrypoints' defers entirely), and some directives remain strategy-level, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The multi-wave process is explicitly sequenced (establish evidence → choose and execute the wave → reflect and challenge → continue or finish) with real validation checkpoints: pre-edit justification, 'Inspect the returned diff, run relevant checks', 'Distinguish worker-reported checks from checks Codex reproduced', regression re-exercise of the changed journey, an error-recovery path when UI access is blocked, and explicit stop conditions. Feedback loops are present throughout. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is good: five well-organized sections, and each linked skill ([delegate-claude], [consult-claude], [post-implementation-review], [adversarial-review], [collapse-pass]) is referenced one level deep with a stated ownership scope ('The delegation skill owns clone preparation, dispatch, correction, and integration mechanics'). However, all five references point to sibling skills outside this bundle, none of which exist in the skill's directory — the skill ships with no references/, scripts/, or assets/ files, so the linked material cannot be verified from the bundle itself. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |