Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, highly actionable prescriptive skill body with a clear drafting workflow, validation checklists, and a well-structured one-level-deep reference layout. Only minor conciseness trim opportunities remain.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and prescriptive with no basic-concept padding, but rhetorical framing like "Ordered by how often they get broken" and "Read this before the style rules, because it constrains all of them" are minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete before/after examples ("Write 'To delete the document, click **Delete**', not 'Click **Delete** to delete the document'") and specific banned-word lists give fully actionable, case-covering guidance appropriate to an instruction-only skill. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The "Draft or revise" sequence, the "Before you finish" checklist, and the line-by-line fidelity pass ("Is there a single sentence you wrote that the source does not support? Delete it.") provide a clear sequence with explicit validation and a feedback loop. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The "Look it up" section signals one-level-deep references (rules.md, word-list.md, official-pages.md), each with when-to-read guidance, and all three referenced files exist in references/. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |