Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean, actionable, and well-structured with a clear numbered workflow, concrete code, explicit typecheck validation, and a strong anti-patterns section. It scores a consistent 4 across dimensions, held from 5 by some trimmable rationale prose, code placeholders, the absence of an explicit error-recovery loop, and a single-file structure that does not split content into one-level-deep references.
Suggestions
Tighten or move the historical rationale (the 'Replaces workspace-app-composition' opener, 'They used to be conflated', and 'Why not suffixes') into a short 'Deprecated patterns' note so the main body stays leaner and earns a higher conciseness score.
Replace the PlatformAuth placeholder ({ /* ... */ }) with a minimal concrete contract shape and show a full tsconfig.<condition>.json snippet for step 4 so the declaration steps are fully copy-paste ready.
Add an explicit validate-fix-retry loop (e.g. 'run typecheck; on failure, fix the offending leaf and re-run') around step 4 to raise workflow_clarity, since dropped/misconfigured leaves are the named hazard.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and lean with no explanation of basic concepts, but contains some trimmable historical/rationale prose (the workspace-app-composition replacement note, the 'Why not suffixes' and conflation history), matching anchor 4; not 5 because those sections could be trimmed, not 3 because it is mostly efficient. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a numbered 5-step declaration process with concrete code blocks (package.json imports, bare import, vite.config.ts conditions, types.ts contract) plus concrete anti-patterns, but includes placeholders (PlatformAuth = { /* ... */ }) and describes step 4 rather than fully showing it, matching anchor 4; not 5 because not fully copy-paste ready, not 3 because guidance is concrete rather than pseudocode. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 5-step sequence with step 4 (typecheck every leaf) as an explicit validation checkpoint and named tests (platform-selection.test.ts, build-applications.test.ts) as verification, matching anchor 4; not 5 because there is no explicit fix-retry error-recovery loop, not 3 because validation is present and named. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single self-contained file with well-organized section headers and no nested or external references (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ bundles exist), matching anchor 4; not 5 because the body exceeds 50 lines and is not structured as an overview pointing to one-level-deep reference files, not 3 because it is well-organized rather than buried. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |