Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable writing-guidelines skill: concrete do/don't rules reinforced by contrasting good/bad examples per platform, with a clearly signaled link to the writing-voice skill. Its only slack is slight redundancy in the volume of examples and post-example commentary, and a large examples section kept inline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient — terse rule lists and no explanations of concepts Claude already knows — but six full good/bad example blocks plus trailing commentary lines ("The difference: the good tweet teaches something specific...") could be trimmed, matching 'efficient with minor instances of over-explanation' rather than the every-token-earns-its-place of level 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully concrete for an instruction-only skill: explicit per-platform limits ("LinkedIn: 3-5 lines max"), itemized remove/add lists, and copy-ready good/bad exemplars for each platform and post type covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple single-purpose skill (draft a post) with unambiguous organization — platform rules, then what to remove, what to add, then exemplars — and no destructive or batch operations, so the simple-skill exception applies and the single action is clear end to end. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are clearly headed and the one external dependency ([writing-voice](../writing-voice/SKILL.md)) is a clearly-signaled one-level reference; the ~100-line examples section could arguably be split into a separate file, which is a minor organization gap rather than misplaced content. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |