Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, high-signal pattern reference: every bullet is a non-obvious SvelteKit rule with concrete file and API names, and the short length keeps it fully self-contained. The weaknesses are the absence of any sequenced workflow with validation checkpoints and the lack of a small executable example for the most common task (form actions with fail()).
Suggestions
Add a minimal validation step or checkpoint to the editing workflow (e.g., 'after changing route files, run `svelte-check` or verify against the generated `./$types` before proceeding') so workflow_clarity gains an explicit feedback loop.
Include one compact executable example of a form action using `fail()` in `+page.server.ts` to anchor the most common task pattern.
Add a one-line decision sequence for routing requests (e.g., load in layout/page → hooks for auth → server-only code in `$lib/server`) so the topic-grouped bullets also read as an ordered workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean, imperative bullet guidance with zero padding and no explanations of concepts Claude already knows — every line carries a non-obvious SvelteKit-specific rule (e.g., "Server `load` return values must be serializable", "Do not store shared mutable request state in server modules"). | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete file paths and API names (`+page.server.ts`, `$lib/server`, `./$types`, `fail()`, `use:enhance`, `event.locals`) make the guidance directly applicable, but no executable code snippets cover common cases like a form action returning `fail()` — minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Decision rules are unambiguous per topic and an upstream grounding step exists ("ask DeepWiki a narrow question against `sveltejs/kit` before relying on memory. Verify decisive details against local installed types and source"), but there is no sequenced workflow and no post-edit validation checkpoints — sequence present only implicitly. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is ~31 lines with well-organized section headers and no external references needed; per the rubric's guideline for sub-50-line skills with no need for external references, well-organized sections alone warrant a 5, and no bundle files exist to misstructure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |