Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured design-judgment skill: lean, concrete checklists and questions, a sequenced workflow with verification checkpoints, and clean one-level-deep references to real bundle files. No significant weaknesses relative to the rubric anchors.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~115-line body assumes Claude's competence, explains no basic concepts, and keeps every section action-oriented; prose is lean with only minor abstract flourish that still drives decisions. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Instruction-only guidance is concrete and specific: an enumerated state surface (loading, empty, error, disabled, pending, selected, filter-empty), four diagnostic collapse questions, a delegation table, and a design-read template. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The seven-step Canonical Path is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (browser verification in step 6, pre-flight in step 7), and UI work is not destructive/batch so the absence of a fix-retry loop is not penalized. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clear overview points one level deep to five real references (direction-discovery, comparable-apps, component-system, anti-slop-tells, preflight), each signaled with when to read it; no nested references and easy navigation. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |