Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, lean instruction skill: a sequenced canonical path with validation checkpoints, copy-ready templates, and clean one-level-deep references that all resolve to real files. It sits just below the top anchor on conciseness and actionability because its reusable units are prose templates and abstract concepts rather than directly executable code.
Suggestions
Tighten abstract terms like 'greenfield composition', 'component-system collapse', and 'load-bearing interaction' with a one-line concrete gloss so the reader reads them rather than inferring them, which would lift conciseness toward the top anchor.
Add at least one concrete, copy-pasteable example of a collapse pass on a real markup snippet (before/after) to convert the prose templates into directly executable guidance.
Optional: include a one-line 'what good output looks like' example for the design-read template so the actionable unit is fully self-contained.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes competence — no padding explaining what Svelte or Tailwind is — but recurring conceptual phrasing like 'greenfield composition', 'component-system collapse', and 'load-bearing interaction' is abstract enough to leave a reader inferring intent rather than reading it directly, keeping it just below the lean top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives a concrete 7-step path, copy-ready txt templates (design read, collapse pass, pre-flight checklist), and exact prohibitions ('Does not import from packages/ui/src'), which is highly actionable for an instruction-only skill; it stops short of 5 because the actionable units are prose templates rather than executable code or commands. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly numbered 7-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints — step 6 'Verify visible, responsive, and interactive results in the browser' and step 7 'Run UI pre-flight before final handoff or committing the change' — plus a dedicated pre-flight reference for feedback and exception handling. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A concise overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep references, each gated by a concrete trigger condition (e.g. 'Read references/comparable-apps.md when the design question depends on category fit'), and all referenced files exist in ./references/. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |