CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

yjs

Yjs CRDT patterns, shared types (Y.Map, Y.Array, Y.Text), transactions, y-protocols sync and awareness, y-indexeddb persistence, conflict resolution, and document storage. Use when mentioning Yjs, Y.Doc, CRDTs, collaborative editing, real-time sync, awareness, IndexeddbPersistence, or Yjs providers.

68

Quality

82%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

65%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A knowledgeable, code-rich Yjs reference with excellent actionability, but it is long and mixes a basic primer plus an oversized inline abstraction-leaks tutorial with the core patterns, and its destructive-storage operations lack explicit validation loops.

Suggestions

Move the full abstraction-leaks tutorial (the 'Boundary Rule' diagram and 'How to Spot Abstraction Leaks' list) into the referenced docs/articles/yjs-abstraction-leaks-cost-more-than-the-abstraction.md file and keep only a brief pointer in SKILL.md, since that file does not currently exist.

Tighten the 'Shared Types' primer — drop the 'like JavaScript Map/Array' glosses Claude already knows and keep only the Yjs-specific notes (e.g. the six-type inventory and editor-integration caveat).

Add an explicit validate→fix→retry checkpoint around the clearData reset and epoch-compaction flows (e.g. 'verify no active writers, then clearData, then re-hydrate and confirm state') to satisfy the destructive/batch-operation feedback-loop requirement.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Dense expert material with little concept padding, but the ~360-line body includes a basic shared-types primer ('Y.Map - Key-value pairs (like JavaScript Map)') and a lengthy inline abstraction-leaks tutorial with an ASCII diagram that could be tightened or moved out.

2 / 3

Actionability

Multiple complete, executable TypeScript snippets (single-writer counters, fractional indexing, nested maps, epoch compaction, debugging) plus specific API calls, all copy-paste oriented.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The 'Upstream Grounding' procedure is a clear verify-before-changing loop, but destructive operations like the clearData reset and compaction lack explicit validate→fix→retry checkpoints, capping workflow clarity per the destructive-ops feedback-loop guideline.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Well-headed sections and one-level-deep references, but no bundle files exist so the referenced local article path (docs/articles/...) is dangling, and the large inline abstraction-leaks tutorial is content that arguably should live in the referenced file rather than inline.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: specific capabilities, broad natural trigger terms, explicit when-to-use guidance, and a clearly distinct Yjs niche. No notable weaknesses to address.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Enumerates many concrete capabilities — 'shared types (Y.Map, Y.Array, Y.Text)', 'transactions', 'y-protocols sync and awareness', 'y-indexeddb persistence', 'conflict resolution' — matching the multiple-specific-actions anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly states what it does and when to use it via the 'Use when mentioning ...' clause, satisfying both the what and the when.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Covers natural user phrasing broadly: 'Yjs', 'Y.Doc', 'CRDTs', 'collaborative editing', 'real-time sync', 'awareness', 'IndexeddbPersistence', 'Yjs providers' — the terms a user would actually say.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Niche Yjs-specific triggers ('Y.Doc', 'IndexeddbPersistence', 'Yjs providers') make it unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
EpicenterHQ/epicenter
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.