Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced recovery playbook: concrete templates, per-guideline fix steps, decision tables, and validation checklists, with almost no wasted tokens. The two weak points are a single time-sensitive dated claim and the inlining of platform-specific taxonomy tables that would benefit from separate reference files.
Suggestions
Move the Apple Rejection Taxonomy and Google Play Rejection Taxonomy tables into per-platform reference files (e.g. references/apple-taxonomy.md, references/play-taxonomy.md) and load only the one matching the user's platform, keeping SKILL.md as the diagnosis/workflow overview.
Place the '(Since 2024, US users can have External Purchase Link Entitlement...)' note in a clearly marked policy-change/exceptions section so the dated reference doesn't go stale silently.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, table-driven playbook with no filler and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows — every section is an instruction, lookup table, or template. One dated claim ('Since 2024, US users can have External Purchase Link Entitlement...') is time-sensitive information not placed in a deprecated/old-patterns section, which per the judging guidelines warrants a minor penalty. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully concrete: a copy-paste Resolution Center response template, an exact navigation path ('App Store Connect → Contact Us → App Review → Expedited Request'), per-guideline numbered fix steps, and explicit rules ('Never argue the guideline', 'Always reference the new build number'). Covers the common rejection cases with fill-in-ready material. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence with an explicit gate ('Do not start writing the fix until you've classified the rejection type below'), a diagnosis-first assessment section, appeal-vs-fix decision table, a resubmission checklist, and a feedback loop ('If rejected again: <next escalation step>'). Validation checkpoints are present in the output template. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized single-file body with clear section headers and one-level cross-skill handoffs, and no bundle files exist to create nested references. However, the Apple and Google Play taxonomy tables are platform-specific reference material inlined in the main body that could be split into per-platform reference files loaded only once the platform is known — a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |