Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, actionable crash-analytics skill that leads with concrete thresholds, executable code/commands, and explicit release-feedback loops. The main gaps are minor: a slightly explanatory ASO 'why' section and 1-star workflow lacking a verification step.
Suggestions
Tighten 'Why Crash Rate Is an ASO Signal' to the target metrics and drop the explanatory bullets that restate well-known ranking mechanics, to lift conciseness toward 5.
Add a verification step to the 'Responding to Crash-Driven 1-Star Reviews' workflow (e.g., confirm the crash fix is live and crash rate dropped before replying to reviews) to strengthen workflow_clarity.
Consider extracting the per-platform Crashlytics setup and the full triage priority table into a reference file linked from SKILL.md to improve progressive_disclosure now that the file is over 150 lines.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and dense with domain-specific facts (crash-free targets, triage weights, phased-release percentages) that Claude would not reliably know; the 'Why Crash Rate Is an ASO Signal' section is mildly explanatory and could be trimmed. Not a 5 because of that minor over-explanation; not a 3 because the bulk earns its place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready elements across the common cases — the upload-symbols bash command, the gradle dependency line, concrete P0–P3 triage thresholds, the crash-rate formula, and the 1%→100% phased-release schedule. Matches the fully-executable anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step processes (triage, crash-report debugging, 1-star response) are numbered and sequenced, with an explicit feedback loop ('If crash rate increases >0.2%, pause rollout') and a 'write a failing test before fixing' checkpoint. Not a 5 because the 1-star review workflow lacks a validation checkpoint; not a 3 because most checkpoints are present. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single well-sectioned SKILL.md (~165 lines) with clear headers and no nested references; cross-skill navigation is clear via 'Related Skills'. Not a 5 because some inline material (detailed per-platform setup, triage tables) could plausibly live in reference files; not a 3 because structure is genuinely good. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |