Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, well-structured operational guide that earns its tokens: almost everything is App Store-specific data (limits, specs, timing, placement algorithm factors) plus ready-to-use output templates. The main deductions are minor internal duplication, an inconsistent submission lead time stated three different ways, and a single-file layout where a couple of reference tables could be split out for a leaner overview.
Suggestions
Reconcile the submission lead time into one figure — the body says '3-5 days before' (Step 4), '4-5 days early' (Common Mistakes), and '4 days before start' (Output Format).
De-duplicate the image spec (specs table vs. Step 3) and the monthly cadence advice (Optimization Tips vs. Common Mistakes); state each once and cross-reference.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint in Step 4: before submitting, verify the name/short/long copy lengths against the 30/50/120 char limits and confirm start/end dates leave review headroom.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Nearly every line carries App Store-specific facts Claude cannot be assumed to know (30-char name / 50-char short / 120-char long limits, 2160x1080 image, 31-day max, 10 concurrent events, 24-48h review time). Not a 5 because of duplicated content: the image spec appears in both the specs table and Step 3, and the 'one event per month' guidance appears in Optimization Tips and again in Common Mistakes. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete and executable throughout: exact field limits, ✅/❌ copy examples, an App Store Connect click-path, a thumbnail test at 390x195px, and a copy-paste-ready event brief and calendar template. Not a 5 because the submission lead time is stated three inconsistent ways ("3-5 days", "4-5 days early", template's "4 days before start") and there is no fully worked example of a completed event brief. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step planning workflow (idea selection by app category and goal, copy, image, submit) is clearly sequenced, with the thumbnail legibility test acting as a checkpoint. Not a 5 because there is no explicit pre-submit validation step (e.g., verify char counts against the limits before filling in App Store Connect); not a 3 because the sequence is coherent and checkpoints are mostly present — and the skill is neither destructive nor batch, so no hard cap applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single self-contained file with no references/, scripts/, or assets/ bundle; sections are well-organized with headers, tables, and a Related Skills routing section, and there are no nested or dead references. Not a 5 because at ~165 lines some reference material (the event-type matrix and app-category mapping, or the keyword/notification optimization detail) could be split into one-level-deep reference files to keep SKILL.md a leaner overview. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |