Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A clear, well-sequenced ASO keyword research workflow with a concrete scoring formula and ready-to-use output templates. Its main weakness is that the data-acquisition steps assume a tool/API without naming one, and it lacks a final validation checkpoint on the generated report.
Suggestions
Name the concrete tool or API for each data-gathering step (e.g., how to fetch Apple Search Suggestions and competitor keyword rankings) so the guidance is fully executable rather than intent-only.
Trim the persona opener and the "Why it matters" column to remove explanations of cause-and-effect Claude already knows, tightening token efficiency.
Add a short validation/review checkpoint before emitting the report (e.g., confirm every Primary keyword has a non-zero Opportunity score and that title/subtitle/keyword-field character limits are respected).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean with well-organized phases, tables, and a concrete formula, but the persona opener ("You are an expert ASO keyword researcher with deep knowledge…") and the "Why it matters" column over-explain cause-and-effect Claude already knows; sits above the 3 anchor yet short of fully lean at 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete guidance — an explicit Opportunity formula with weights, scored signals, grouping counts (Primary 3-5, Secondary 5-10), and copy-ready output templates — but data-gathering steps like "get autocomplete suggestions" and "pull keyword rankings for competitors" name no tool, API, or command, leaving a minor executable gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Cleanly sequenced Initial Assessment → Phase 1-4 → Output Format pipeline with specific per-phase deliverables; this is a non-destructive analysis task so the validation cap does not apply, and it earns 4 rather than 5 because no explicit verification or review checkpoint closes the loop before producing the report. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured single-file skill with clear section headers and a self-contained body; no bundle files exist and references ("Related Skills", app-marketing-context.md) are one level deep and clearly signaled, so it lands at 4 rather than 5 because nothing is split into load-on-demand bundle materials. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |