Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, information-dense skill body with concrete ASO specifics and a clear three-phase workflow. The main improvement opportunities are moving the market-tier reference tables to a bundle file, tightening the persona opener, and specifying how to execute the monitoring steps.
Suggestions
Move the Tier 1/Tier 2 market tables into a references/ file (e.g. references/markets.md) and keep a short decision framework inline, which would push progressive disclosure toward the top anchor.
Specify the tool or method for Phase 3 monitoring (e.g. 'run keyword-research weekly per market and compare rankings') so every step is executable rather than directional.
Trim the 'You are an expert in...' opener and generic cultural rows ('Diverse representation, culturally appropriate') to reclaim tokens without losing clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with non-obvious domain data (char limits, locale codes, weighted scoring factors, per-language keyword examples) and explains almost nothing Claude already knows; only minor trimmable padding remains, like the 'You are an expert in...' persona opener and a few generic cultural-adaptation rows. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout — exact character limits (30/30/100/4000/170), App Store locale codes, a weighted market-scoring table, and a copy-paste output template. It falls short of fully executable because a few steps ('Monitor keyword rankings (weekly)', 'Track conversion rate by country') don't specify the tool or method. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Three numbered phases with a clear sequence and some explicit checkpoints ('Review with keyword data — does the translation include high-volume terms?', 'Iterate based on performance data'). Not a 5: the Initial Assessment answers aren't explicitly wired into the prioritization step, and Phase 3 monitoring lacks validation criteria for when to iterate. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the single-file body is well-sectioned with clear headers and a related-skills section. At ~165 lines it exceeds the simple-skill exception, and the Tier 1/Tier 2 market tables are reference-like content that could be split out — good structure with minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |