Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-crafted, token-efficient instruction skill: dense actionable heuristics, clear audit workflow, and concrete output templates. The main gaps are the undefined screen-scoring scale in Step 2 and the absence of any post-recommendation verification step.
Suggestions
Define the scoring scale in the Step 2 table (e.g., score each factor 0-2 and give the decision rule for when a screen is removed, deferred, or kept).
Add a validation checkpoint after the audit output, such as 'confirm each recommended change against the drop-off data gathered in the Initial Assessment before presenting the revised flow'.
Consider moving the funnel benchmark and app-type pattern tables into a references/ file to keep SKILL.md as a lean overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and dense — tables and compact flow diagrams carry domain-specific heuristics (benchmarks, permission timing, conversion rates) that Claude cannot be assumed to know, with no re-explanation of familiar concepts. Every section earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and specific (permission timing table, sign-up friction patterns with recommendations, output-format templates), but the Step 2 'Score Each Screen' table leaves the Score column empty and defines only '0 = skip it', so the actual per-factor scoring scale is undefined. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence runs from Initial Assessment (baseline gathering) through Audit Steps 1-4 to pattern selection and a defined output format. Checkpoints exist up front, but there are no downstream validation or verification steps (e.g., confirming recommendations against funnel data), which the top anchor expects. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the ~190-line body is well organized into clearly signaled sections with one-level cross-skill references. Benchmark tables and app-type patterns are arguably large enough to split into reference files, so content placement is good but not fully split. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |