Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, gated workflow body with strong sequencing, validation, and feedback loops, plus correctly signaled reference files. It is held back by abstract, non-executable guidance in places and dense inline gate prose.
Suggestions
Add at least one worked mini-example (e.g., a concrete archetype-routing or reference-model contract) so the abstract gate directives become actionable.
Consider extracting the per-gate schema details (trigger/inputs/actions/evidence_refs/claim_ceiling/failure_return) into a reference file to reduce inline density and aid navigation.
Provide a concrete checklist or template for the '专业工具与authority接口' selection row so the routing steps are executable rather than descriptive.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes Claude's competence without explaining basic concepts; nearly every line carries a rule. It is efficient, though a few abstract directive clauses could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides some concrete templates ("用户改变什么 → 模型执行什么 → 观察什么证据 → 最多能解释什么") and a typed archetype table, but most guidance is abstract directives about gates and claim ceilings with no executable specifics or worked examples. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The G1–G8 gates form an explicit ordered sequence, each with 输入与动作/晋升证据/失败返回/Ceiling — concrete validation checkpoints and feedback loops back to earlier gates, plus a 停止与交接 termination section. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear section structure with two well-signaled, one-level-deep references (references/tool-profiles.md, references/patterns.md) that exist as real files; minor organization gaps remain in the dense inline gate descriptions. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |