Content
60%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A thorough, well-structured instruction skill with concrete procedures, validation checkpoints, and a well-signaled one-level reference file. Its main weakness is verbosity: the body is long and repeats core invariants across sections rather than consolidating them.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated N/A philosophy, "do not fake backend/persistence/permissions", and "derive everything from one authoritative object" invariants into a single invariants section and reference it instead of restating in every section.
Move the detailed visual-rule enumeration (font-size thresholds, decoration-rail rules, border-left/角括号 lists) into references/patterns.md, keeping only the testable checks (skin-stripping test, 去控件检查) inline.
Add a short top-of-body quick-start that names the three work modes and links to the contract template and 实施与验收 sequence, so the core workflow is reachable without scrolling the full prose.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | At ~180 lines of dense prose the body is noticeably verbose, with the same invariants (mark N/A + reason, never fake backend/persistence/permissions, derive from one authoritative object) restated across many sections; these padded repetitions could be consolidated without losing guidance. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance for an instruction-only skill: product-type/mode/applicability tables, a one-page contract template with named fields, a per-judgment line template ("current object / primary evidence / decision input / available command / completion evidence"), and specific tests (skin-stripping test, 去控件检查, ≥14 CSS px rule). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The "实施与验收" section gives a 7-step sequence with validation checkpoints (blocker check before proceeding, representative non-empty state render, vertical closed-loop, environment/density testing, command→state→output mapping) plus a final "交付前确认" checklist; the workflow is somewhat fragmented across other sections rather than one self-contained flow. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Core flow is inline with clear section headers, and detailed patterns are offloaded to a real one-level-deep reference ([references/patterns.md](references/patterns.md), verified present with its own TOC and sectioned contents); the body itself remains long and could move more detail into the reference. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |