comfort-package

海岚旅行舒适游产品说明（HL-P-02）：基础4晚，适用对象、包含与不含、目的地清单（含高原标记）、每日安排框架、人数上限。

Quality

70%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./experimental/simulation/scenarios/travel_agency/materials/comfort-package/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is an exemplary lean product reference: dense, well-structured tables with concrete, unambiguous facts and no wasted tokens. Its only real weakness is that it leans on external materials — the SOP selection matrix and the price list — that are not included in the bundle, so an agent following it cannot fully resolve eligibility rules or pricing.

Suggestions

Bundle or link the SOP 选择矩阵 and 价目表 referenced in the body (e.g. under references/ with inline links), so the eligibility rule and suite-upgrade pricing are resolvable without external state.

Add one line of guidance on what to do when a destination marked 高原 (plateau) is chosen — e.g. whether to flag altitude precautions — to close the loop on the '高原标记' column.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is pure table- and list-based product facts with zero padding, no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, and no filler — every token earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor exactly.	5 / 5
Actionability	Guidance is highly concrete (exact caps '每团8人', budget thresholds '人均每晚预算超过500元、不超过2,000元', named destinations, a day-by-day framework), but '按 SOP 选择矩阵' and '价格见价目表' depend on materials that are not bundled, leaving minor gaps that keep it short of fully self-contained.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	As a simple single-purpose reference skill the content is well-sequenced and unambiguous ('第1天…最后一天' plus the explicit conditional rule on suite upgrades), but the unresolved SOP and price-table dependencies are workflow gaps that prevent the full simple-skill score of 5.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Sections are clearly headed and well organized for a compact single-file skill, but the body references external documents (SOP 选择矩阵, 价目表) that are neither bundled nor linked, which is a minor organization/navigation gap.	4 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Description

58%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly and specifically previews the skill's contents but functions as a table of contents rather than a capability-plus-trigger statement. It entirely lacks a 'Use when...' clause and natural trigger phrases, which limits its discoverability and completeness.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. '当客人咨询舒适型跟团产品、预算在人均每晚500–2,000元区间时使用' (Use when a customer asks about comfort-tier packages within the per-person nightly budget range).

Include natural user-facing synonyms and variations such as '舒适型', '跟团游', '行程安排', and '报价' alongside '舒适游' to improve trigger term coverage.

State the skill's action (e.g. '回答产品咨询并规划行程' — answer product inquiries and plan itineraries) rather than only listing the document's sections, so the 'what' describes a capability.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description enumerates several concrete content areas ('基础4晚', '包含与不含', '目的地清单（含高原标记）', '每日安排框架', '人数上限'), giving a specific picture of the skill's scope, though these are topics rather than executable actions with minor coverage gaps.	4 / 5
Completeness	The 'what' is clear — the description enumerates the product spec's contents — but there is no 'when' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3 per the judging guidelines.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Relevant domain keywords are present ('舒适游', '产品说明', 'HL-P-02', '高原') but common natural variations a user would say ('舒适型', '跟团', '行程', '报价') are missing, and there is no 'Use when...' trigger phrasing.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The product code 'HL-P-02' and brand '海岚旅行' carve a fairly distinct niche, but sibling tier/package skills would share a nearly identical trigger surface, creating minor overlap risk with closely related skills rather than the minimal risk of a 5.	4 / 5
	Total	14 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: EverMind-AI/Raven
Path: experimental/simulation/scenarios/travel_agency/materials/comfort-package/SKILL.md
Commit: e6c0344

Reviewed: 1 day ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.