Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, dense domain contract with a clearly sequenced seven-gate workflow, explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops, and clean progressive disclosure to two real reference files. Its only weakness is mild repetition of the read-only/zero-write and claim-ceiling patterns across gates.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and competence-assuming with no padding of basic concepts, but the Diagnose/Audit zero-write rule and claim-ceiling pattern recur across several gates and could be consolidated, leaving minor trims. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Instruction-only yet concrete: named gates, recordable fields (input/output hash, lineage), explicit claim-ceiling labels (composition candidate, internal-positive) and allowed/forbidden actions give mostly executable guidance with only minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven gates are explicitly sequenced, each with trigger/inputs/actions/evidence/claim_ceiling/failure_return; failure_return fields create explicit feedback loops back to specific earlier gates and claim ceilings act as validation checkpoints. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Body is an overview that points to two real one-level-deep references (patterns.md, tool-profiles.md) with clear trigger conditions for when to read each; content is appropriately split and easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |