Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary instruction-only skill body: concrete, tabular, and lean, with a real validation checklist closing the loop. The only real improvement areas are moving version-history details out of the intro and making the checklist's fix-and-recheck loop explicit.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a dense, table-driven spec with no padded explanations of things Claude already knows; every line carries spec content. It falls short of 5 only because time-sensitive version history ("2026年9月25日起执行（V4.1：… V4.2：…）") is inlined in the intro rather than placed in a changelog/deprecated section, adding tokens that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully concrete, copy-ready guidance for an instruction-only skill: exact filename pattern ("海岚旅行-报价编号.pptx"), a per-page table with required contents, verbatim contact-page text, and explicit sourcing rules ("以计调确认为准", 查证事实注明来源). No abstract directions anywhere. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence (格式 → 页序与每页内容 → 不得出现 → 顾问质检清单) ends in an explicit 9-item validation checklist covering price consistency, external-info sourcing, and prohibited content. It sits at 4 rather than 5 because the error-recovery loop — what to do when a checklist item fails, and re-checking after the fix — is implied but never stated. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is 40 lines with no bundle directories (references/, scripts/, assets/ do not exist) and four well-organized sections; referenced external documents (HL-MKT-GUIDE-07, HL-MKT-TPL-08) are org-level specs, not nested skill files. Per the simple-skill note, well-organized sections with no need for external references score 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |