Conciseness

The body is lean and table-driven — '基础晚数 | 5晚，可加晚，不可减晚', '不含: 加晚、加向导日、旅游意外险、个人消费' — with no padding and nothing explained that Claude would already know. Every token earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor.

Actionability

Mostly concrete, actionable guidance: exact inclusions ('两天私人向导', '一项特别体验...三选一'), a specific planning-call procedure ('采集联系电话，提交规划通话转交单，不提交占位申请', '不得先行承诺'), and a day-by-day table. It falls short of 5 because '按 SOP 选择矩阵第1、2条' references a matrix that is not bundled or linked, and the 转交单 submission mechanics (where/how) are unspecified.

Workflow Clarity

The 规划通话 section gives a clear sequence — 报起价 → 客人接受 → 采集联系电话 → 提交转交单（不提交占位申请）→ 资深顾问2个工作日内致电 → 通话后办理合同 — with an explicit boundary rule ('在线顾问不得先行承诺'). Not 5 because there are no checkpoints for edge cases (e.g., what to do if the customer cannot be reached) and the 转交单 step lacks detail; not a destructive/batch operation so no cap applies.

Progressive Disclosure

A single ~50-line file with well-organized sections (包含, 不含, 规划通话, 常见目的地, 每日安排框架) and no nested or buried references, which fits the simple-skill pattern. Docked one point because 'SOP 选择矩阵' is referenced but not present in any bundled file, leaving a dangling pointer.

Specificity

The description names the exact product ('定制游产品说明（HL-P-03）') and enumerates concrete content areas with hard facts — '基础5晚', '包含与不含', '规划通话流程', '常见目的地（含高原标记）', '每日安排框架', '人数上限' — comprehensively covering every section of the body. It is not score 4 because coverage has no visible gaps.

Completeness

The 'what' is explicit and detailed (product spec for HL-P-03 covering inclusions, exclusions, planning call, destinations, itinerary), but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance telling Claude when to consult this skill. Per the judging guidelines, a missing 'Use when' clause caps completeness at 3.

Trigger Term Quality

Good natural keyword coverage: '定制游', '产品说明', 'HL-P-03', '规划通话', '高原', '人数上限' — terms a travel advisor would naturally say. A few natural synonyms are missing (e.g., '报价/起价', '私人向导', '行程'), so it falls just below the comprehensive-with-synonyms anchor of 5.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The company name '海岚旅行' plus the unique product code 'HL-P-03' carve out a clear niche with minimal conflict risk against any other skill — a user mentioning these terms can only mean this skill.