Conciseness

The body is pure load-bearing data — terse pricing rules ("价格为每人基础价，单位人民币元…含出发城市往返大交通") plus lean tables, with zero explanation of concepts Claude already knows and nothing to trim. The version/effective-date line ("V3.1，2026年9月15日起执行") is core data for a *current* price list, not conditional old/new-pattern guidance, so it is not penalized.

Actionability

The guidance is fully usable to compute a quote: complete price matrices for all three products, extra-night and add-on pricing, and explicit resolution rules ("季节档按出发日期所在档确定；人数档按全团总人数（含儿童）确定"), lodging handling, and a clear pointer for out-of-scope items ("儿童价、预付款、退改规则见预订规则 HL-CS-POL-02"). Per the scoring notes, absence of code in an instruction/data skill is not penalized when the guidance is actionable — here the common quoting cases are fully covered.

Workflow Clarity

This is a simple single-purpose lookup skill and the 计价规则 section makes the single action unambiguous: determine the season tier from the departure date, the size tier from total headcount, read the matrix, then add extras. The simple-skill exception applies, and since quoting is neither destructive nor a batch operation, no validation checkpoint is required.

Progressive Disclosure

There are no bundle files and no need for external references — all price data appropriately lives inline in one cohesive, well-sectioned document (计价规则, 季节档, per-product tables, 附加项), and the single external pointer (HL-CS-POL-02) is clearly signaled one level away. Well-organized sections satisfy the rubric for a self-contained skill of this size.

Specificity

The description lists several specific content items — "经济游、舒适游、定制游按季节档和人数档的每人基础价，加晚、附加项，季节档与住宿规则" — matching the anchor for several specific items with minor gaps. It is not 5 because it is a noun-phrase inventory of contents rather than capability actions, and it omits parts of the quoting workflow (children's pricing, prepayment, refunds are deferred to another document); not 3 because it names far more than 1-2 concrete items.

Completeness

The "what" is clear (the company's current price list and its contents), but "when" is only weakly implied by "报价的唯一依据" — there is no explicit "Use when..." or equivalent trigger clause, which caps completeness at 3 per the judging guidelines. Not 4 because the usage时机 is never explicitly stated.

Trigger Term Quality

Good keyword coverage with natural terms a user would say: "报价", "价目表", "经济游/舒适游/定制游", "价格". It is not 5 because common user phrasings and synonyms such as "多少钱", "费用", "团费", "价格表" are missing; not 3 because coverage goes well beyond bare domain naming.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"海岚旅行现行价目表（HL-FIN-PRC-06 V3.1）" pins a distinct niche — one company's current price list with a document ID and version — with minimal overlap risk against any other skill. This matches the clear-niche anchor exactly.