Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — a token-efficient command/purpose/failure table and tight workflow steps with no concept-padding Claude already knows — so every token earns its place per anchor 3.

Actionability

It provides fully executable commands throughout — exact git/gh invocations in the Context table and a copy-paste-ready heredoc commit example in Step 4 — satisfying anchor 3's copy-paste-ready criterion.

Workflow Clarity

Five sequenced steps include explicit validation checkpoints (clean-tree detection, detached-HEAD branch prompt, re-read-before-commit, post-commit git status verification), matching anchor 3's clear-sequence-with-validation requirement for this batch operation.

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and none are warranted; the self-contained skill is well-organized into Context/Workflow/Step sections with no nested references, matching the rubric's allowance for well-organized single-purpose skills to score 3.

Specificity

The description names a concrete action and domain ("Create a git commit with a clear, value-communication message") but lists only one core action rather than multiple specific concrete actions, matching anchor 2 rather than anchor 3.

Completeness

It clearly states what it does and includes an explicit "Use when the user asks to commit/save staged or unstaged changes" trigger clause, directly matching anchor 3's what-and-when requirement.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user phrasings are well covered ("commit/save staged or unstaged changes"), which are exactly the terms users say when needing this skill, satisfying anchor 3's good coverage criterion.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The skill occupies a clear niche (git commits) with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills, matching anchor 3 rather than the overlapping anchor 2.