CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ce-pov

Judge a supplied subject against the project's evidence and constraints. Use when assessing an external-adoption question, a holistic take on a document, or a supplied approach set. Use for an oracle panel to consult other models and reconcile their opinions. Use ce-explain for understanding and ce-doc-review for findings review.

68

Quality

84%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured instruction-only skill: tight phased workflow with explicit validation and feedback loops, and clean one-level-deep progressive disclosure to real reference files. Only minor conciseness and actionability polish would lift it further.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean for a complex multi-phase workflow and assumes Claude's competence (scouts, dossiers, ADRs used without explanation); minor trim opportunities in the repeated 'Read references/X.md now' imperative pattern and the embedded ce-docs-root block.

4 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, executable instruction-only guidance — specific file reads, 'git rev-parse --show-toplevel', config.yaml lookup, explicit panel-request and blocked-return decision rules — with a few higher-level directives ('Lead with the decision and preserve the evidence') that stay abstract.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Clear Phase 0–4 sequence with gating reads, an explicit validation checkpoint (Phase 2 Verify Grounding) and feedback loops ('Blocked — missing context', evidence-shortfall handling); the read-only, non-destructive nature means the destructive-cap does not apply.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Overview body points to one-level-deep, well-signaled references (intake, boundaries, grounding, method, cross-model-panel, followup) and supporting scripts, all of which exist as real bundle files; bulk detail is appropriately split out with easy navigation.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: it states a concrete capability, gives explicit 'Use when/Use for' triggers, and differentiates from named sibling skills. Minor room to broaden trigger-term synonyms and tighten the action list to full coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete action types — 'graded verdict on an external-adoption question', 'holistic take on a document', 'position on a supplied approach set', 'consult other models and reconcile their opinions' — naming the domain with multiple specific actions but stopping short of fully comprehensive coverage.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Judge a supplied subject against the project's evidence and constraints') and when ('Use when assessing... Use for an oracle panel...') with concrete trigger phrases, plus sibling-skill routing.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good keyword coverage of the skill family's natural triggers ('external-adoption question', 'holistic take', 'supplied approach set', 'oracle panel', 'cross-check', 'reconcile their opinions'), with a few common synonyms a user might phrase differently missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Carves a clear niche (decisive POV formation) and actively names siblings to differentiate (ce-explain, ce-doc-review, ce-bakeoff, ce-ideate, ce-brainstorm), but the densely overlapping CE skill family leaves minor overlap risk with closely related skills.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.