Give a decisive, project-grounded point of view: a graded verdict on an external-adoption question, a holistic take on a document, or a position on a supplied approach set. Use for a solo POV. Use when asked to consult other models, reconcile their opinions, or `oracle`. Not for findings review (use ce-doc-review), neutral explainers, or generating options (use ce-ideate or ce-brainstorm).
68
83%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Low
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
Skill ce-pov’s peer panel workflow (via `references/agents/pov-peer.md`/`references/cross-model-panel.md`) dispatches fixed-route provider runs where the peer can use `WebSearch`/`WebFetch`/web-only tools, and the peer prompt embeds the subject payload (which may include outsider-authored free text from a user’s provided subject/links) directly into the LLM context.
26bf5b1
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.