CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ce-riffrec-feedback-analysis

Analyze recorded product feedback into evidence for bugs and requirements. Use when a Riffrec capture or other screen, voice, or notes artifact needs interpretation. Use for Riffrec setup, capture, or sharing help when no recording exists yet.

69

Quality

84%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Riffrec Feedback Analysis

Turn raw product feedback into structured evidence for downstream agents. This skill is the consumption side of Riffrec, a capture tool that records synchronized screen + voice + event sessions and emits a riffrec-*.zip bundle.

Done:

  • Setup ends with a current capture/share path.
  • Quick analysis ends with one evidence-backed bug report and no durable artifact unless requested.
  • Extensive analysis ends with the complete evidence set and a ce-brainstorm handoff unless the user asked for extraction only.
  • A missing input, analyzer failure, or unresolved route ends with an actionable blocker rather than a partial success claim.

Choose the path

Route from the input. Read only the references named for that route; do not load the other path references.

  • Setup — user has no recording yet and asks how to install Riffrec, capture a session, or share feedback. Read references/install-riffrec.md.
  • Quick bug report — input is a short recording (under ~60 seconds), the user describes a single specific issue, or asks for "quick", "small", or "just transcribe". Read references/analyzer.md, then references/quick-bug-report.md.
  • Extensive analysis — input is longer, contains multiple issues, requirements, or a workflow walkthrough, or the user wants requirements material. Read references/analyzer.md, then references/extensive-analysis.md. Continue into ce-brainstorm unless the user explicitly asked only to extract or analyze artifacts.

When the input is ambiguous (e.g., a zip arrived without context), inspect the recording length and event count before choosing. If still unclear, ask the user which path applies before running anything heavy.

Common rules

  • Keep raw recordings, audio chunks, zip contents, session dumps, and extracted screenshots local-only by default. Do not commit raw/ or frames/ directories unless the user explicitly asks and privacy is acceptable.
  • Text/metadata artifacts (requirements kickoff material, analysis summaries, problem analyses, source manifests) may be committed when they are needed for traceability and contain no sensitive data.
  • Use repo-relative screenshot paths in any committed doc so later agents can open the evidence without absolute local paths.

The Compound Engineering output format used by the extensive path is documented in references/compound-engineering-feedback-format.md.

Repository
EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin
Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.