Run browser tests for pages affected by the current branch or PR.
68
82%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Passed
No findings from the security scan
Run end-to-end browser tests on pages affected by a PR or branch using the best approved browser driver available in the active harness.
agent-browser, ask whether to run headed or headless.mode:pipeline): invoked by LFG or another automated runner. The run is unattended — never block on a question. Read references/pipeline-orchestration.md from this skill's directory and follow it; it overrides the free-port scan (step 4), dev-server startup (step 5), and visibility prompts (step 6). It still uses the preferred port that step 4 computes.Select the driver before the first browser action:
agent-browser. Read references/agent-browser-driver.md before running any command.Use one driver for the entire run. A selected host-native driver may fall back to agent-browser only if initialization fails before the first route is tested. After testing begins, do not mix driver sessions, element references, screenshots, or authentication state.
Apply the Browser Driver Policy above and record the selected driver. This also requires a git repository with changes to test.
If PR number provided:
gh pr view [number] --json files -q '.files[].path'If 'current' or empty:
git diff --name-only main...HEADIf branch name provided:
git diff --name-only main...[branch]Map each changed file to the route(s) that render it, then build the list of URLs to test. The table below is a starting point of common patterns, not an exhaustive rule set — apply judgment for the project's actual layout:
| File Pattern | Route(s) |
|---|---|
app/views/users/* | /users, /users/:id, /users/new |
app/controllers/settings_controller.rb | /settings |
app/javascript/controllers/*_controller.js | Pages using that Stimulus controller |
app/components/*_component.rb | Pages rendering that component |
app/views/layouts/* | All pages (test homepage at minimum) |
app/assets/stylesheets/* | Visual regression on key pages |
app/helpers/*_helper.rb | Pages using that helper |
src/app/* (Next.js) | Corresponding routes |
src/components/* | Pages using those components |
Determine the preferred port using this priority:
--port 5000, use that directly..env are the trustworthy sources.--port flags..env, .env.local, .env.development for PORT=.3000.# If your in-context project instructions state the dev-server port, set EXPLICIT_PORT first.
PORT="${EXPLICIT_PORT:-}"
if [ -z "$PORT" ]; then
PORT=$(grep -Eo '\-\-port[= ]+[0-9]{4,5}' package.json 2>/dev/null | grep -Eo '[0-9]{4,5}' | head -1)
fi
if [ -z "$PORT" ]; then
PORT=$(grep -h '^PORT=' .env .env.local .env.development 2>/dev/null | tail -1 | cut -d= -f2)
fi
PORT="${PORT:-3000}"
echo "Preferred dev server port: $PORT"Manual mode uses this preferred port as-is — the user controls their own server, so do not scan for alternatives. In pipeline mode, references/pipeline-orchestration.md takes the preferred port value printed here and scans upward to a genuinely free port.
Confirm the server is up before asking the headed/headless question — a manual run with no server stops here, so asking first would waste the question.
if lsof -i ":${PORT}" -sTCP:LISTEN -t >/dev/null 2>&1; then
echo "Server running on port ${PORT}";
else
echo "Server not running on port ${PORT}";
echo "Start your dev server, then re-run:";
echo " Rails: bin/dev or rails server -p ${PORT}";
echo " Node/Next.js: npm run dev";
echo " Custom port: run this skill again with --port <your-port>";
exit 0;
fiIn pipeline mode, do not stop here — references/pipeline-orchestration.md auto-starts the server in the background instead.
Visibility is independent from unattended execution:
Host-native integrated browser: keep its normal integrated surface visible and non-blocking so the user can watch progress when useful. Do not repeatedly steal focus as routes change. This applies in both manual and pipeline modes.
agent-browser fallback, pipeline mode: run headless without asking.
agent-browser fallback, manual mode: ask the user whether to run headed or headless using the platform's blocking question tool: AskUserQuestion in Claude Code (call ToolSearch with select:AskUserQuestion first if its schema isn't loaded), request_user_input in Codex, ask_question in Antigravity CLI (agy), ask_user in Pi (requires the pi-ask-user extension). Fall back to presenting options in chat only when no blocking tool exists in the harness or the call errors. Never silently skip the question:
Do you want to watch the browser tests run?
1. Headed (watch) - Opens a visible browser window
2. Headless (faster) - Runs without a visible windowThen use the selected driver to navigate to http://localhost:<port>, capture its rendered or interactive state, and confirm the root is served before iterating.
For each affected route, use the selected driver to navigate and capture fresh rendered or interactive state.
Verify key elements:
Test critical interactions: derive locators or element references from the selected driver's latest inspected state, perform the click/fill/press action, then inspect the resulting state. Do not guess selectors or reuse stale references.
Take screenshots: capture viewport and full-page evidence when the selected driver supports it. Materialize screenshots as local artifacts when a later workflow or report needs file paths; otherwise in-app evidence is sufficient.
Pause for human input when testing touches flows that require external interaction. Pipeline mode: do not pause — log each such flow as Skip with the reason and continue.
| Flow Type | What to Ask |
|---|---|
| OAuth | "Please sign in with [provider] and confirm it works" |
| "Check your inbox for the test email and confirm receipt" | |
| Payments | "Complete a test purchase in sandbox mode" |
| SMS | "Verify you received the SMS code" |
| External APIs | "Confirm the [service] integration is working" |
Ask the user (using the platform's question tool, or present numbered options and wait):
Human Verification Needed
This test touches [flow type]. Please:
1. [Action to take]
2. [What to verify]
Did it work correctly?
1. Yes - continue testing
2. No - describe the issueWhen a test fails (pipeline mode: do not ask how to proceed — capture the error screenshot and repro steps, log the failure, and continue):
Document the failure:
Ask the user how to proceed:
Test Failed: [route]
Issue: [description]
Console errors: [if any]
How to proceed?
1. Fix now - debug and fix the failing test
2. Skip - continue testing other pagesIf "Fix now": investigate, propose a fix, apply, re-run the failing test
If "Skip": log as skipped, continue
After all tests complete, present a summary:
## Browser Test Results
**Test Scope:** PR #[number] / [branch name]
**Server:** http://localhost:${PORT}
### Pages Tested: [count]
| Route | Status | Notes |
|-------|--------|-------|
| `/users` | Pass | |
| `/settings` | Pass | |
| `/dashboard` | Fail | Console error: [msg] |
| `/checkout` | Skip | Requires payment credentials |
### Console Errors: [count]
- [List any errors found]
### Human Verifications: [count]
- OAuth flow: Confirmed
- Email delivery: Confirmed
### Failures: [count]
- `/dashboard` - [issue description]
### Result: [PASS / FAIL / PARTIAL]# Test current branch changes (auto-detects port)
/ce-test-browser
# Test specific PR
/ce-test-browser 847
# Test specific branch
/ce-test-browser feature/new-dashboard
# Test on a specific port
/ce-test-browser --port 5000When agent-browser is selected as the fallback, read references/agent-browser-driver.md from this skill's directory before running its commands. Host-native drivers follow their harness-provided instructions instead.
a9f6d53
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.