Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a disciplined orchestration index: a clear phased workflow with explicit gates, concrete rules (forbidden bare git commit, exact blocked-result schema), and exemplary progressive disclosure into a verified, well-signaled one-level reference bundle. Its weakness is repetition — the read-fallback and read-timing rules are restated for each reference and could be consolidated into a single rule stated once.
Suggestions
State the read-fallback rule ("if a required reference cannot be read, stop before the action it governs and report the missing file") once in the Execution Workflow preamble instead of repeating it per phase, cutting roughly 6 redundant clauses.
Consolidate the per-reference read-timing meta-rules into the single bolded preamble paragraph and keep only the phase-specific pointer in each phase section.
Surface one or two of the most failure-prone validation details from the references (e.g., what "required verification evidence" minimally means) inline so the completion criteria are checkable without opening the referenced files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body mostly avoids over-explanation and assumes competence, but the fallback clause "If it cannot be read, stop... report which file is missing" is repeated for nearly every reference (~6 times) and read-timing meta-rules are restated per reference, so it could be meaningfully tightened — matching the mostly-efficient-but-could-be-tightened anchor rather than the minor-trimming anchor at 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | As an instruction-only orchestration skill it gives concrete, executable directives: exact reference files to read at each phase, an absolute rule ("A bare `git commit` can absorb the user's pre-existing index, so it is forbidden"), and the exact fields of the blocked result (status, plan_path, run_id, changed_state, blockers, recovery_path). Minor gaps remain because the actual execution detail is deferred to references, fitting anchor 4 rather than fully copy-paste-ready anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced workflow (Phase 0 triage -> Phase 1 workspace/engine/strategy -> Phase 2 execute -> Phase 3-4 shipping -> Return-to-Caller) with explicit checkpoints: the code-review completion gate with authorized skip states, verification evidence requirements, dirty-file collision handling, and blocked-state preservation on failed reads. It is not anchor 5 because several validation specifics (what checks pass, error-recovery loops) live in the referenced files rather than being explicit here. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a lean overview whose detail lives in a flat, one-level-deep bundle; every referenced path (input-triage.md, return-to-caller.md, workspace-setup.md, execution-engines.md, cross-model-execution.md, execution-strategy.md, implementation-loop.md, shipping-workflow.md) was verified to exist, and each is signaled with its read timing and the scope it governs. Cross-links between reference files are peer coordination within one flat directory, not nested content chains, matching the well-signaled one-level-deep anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |