Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An economical, well-organized instruction skill that tells Claude exactly how to plain-language an explanation and when to ask instead of guess. The single weakness is the absence of a worked before/after example, which would lift actionability from strong to exemplary.
Suggestions
Add one short worked example showing a terse source passage and the resulting plain-language explanation, to make the expected output concrete.
Show the 'one short question' fallback with an example question so the ask-don't-guess behavior is unambiguous.
Optionally include a one-line negative example (what NOT to produce: a section-by-section rewrite) to reinforce the 'explain, don't rewrite' rule.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient throughout: it assumes Claude's competence, defines a 'Done' state in one line, and never explains concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, directive guidance ('Open with the point in one or two sentences', 'ask one short question instead of guessing', 'Keep the exact file names, commands, and values') with five enumerated input scenarios; falls just short of a 5 because it gives behavioral rules rather than worked examples of output. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | For a simple single-purpose skill the action is unambiguous: a clear decision tree for picking the target (nothing/file/link/passage/pointer, with an ask-don't-guess fallback) followed by ordered explanation rules; no destructive or batch step, so no validation cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references, yet cleanly organized into 'What to explain' and 'How to explain' sections with a defined Done state; the simple-skill exception applies and structure is clear. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |