Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is well-structured, actionable, and concise, providing concrete verbatim prompts and a clear session workflow with an embedded quality checkpoint; it is a solid, self-contained instruction skill with only minor trimming opportunities.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and skill-specific (the New/True/Useful test is methodology Claude would not already know); the only minor waste is the empty "Lessons" placeholder section. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Verbatim follow-up questions ("What surprised you about that?") and the exact transition offer ("It sounds like this one is resonating—want to develop it further?") are copy-paste ready, though the "What to Hunt For" section stays descriptive. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step "How to Conduct the Session" is clearly sequenced with a floor-test checkpoint and a "keep probing until passes" loop; it is a conversational rather than destructive workflow, so the validation cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is self-contained with no external references and well-organized into clearly labeled sections, but at ~84 lines it sits just over the simple-skill threshold and carries an empty placeholder section. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |