Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable instruction skill: tables for review areas and evidence verdicts, two named diagnostic tests with numbered steps, and ready-to-use output templates. It is held at 4 across dimensions by the empty Lessons placeholder, the dangling context-contract reference, and the lack of a worked example.
Suggestions
Remove or populate the empty 'Lessons' placeholder section to stop it from consuming tokens for no content.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely lean and table-driven with no padding of concepts Claude already knows, but the empty 'Lessons' placeholder and some redundancy between the prose intros and the 'When invoked by the agent' step lists could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready output templates (Full Report, Quick Assessment) with severity levels, a verdict table for evidence, and numbered procedural steps for each structural test; falls short of 5 only because there is no worked example applying a test to a real draft. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The review flow (load context, inspect areas, run structural tests, evidence check, produce report, collaborative fixing loop) is well sequenced with numbered steps and an explicit repeat loop, but the top-level sequence is assembled from sections rather than stated as one explicit ordered checklist. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A self-contained, well-sectioned instruction skill with clear headers and easy navigation; no bundle files exist to split further, and the only external reference (../../references/context-contract.md) is a dangling project-context path rather than a bundled file, a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |