CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

cw-outline

Organize interview material into a detailed structure using the 10%/30% framework. Invoke with /cw-outline or after completing an interview.

Quality

72%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/cw-outline/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is well-structured, actionable, and free of generic padding, offering a concrete template and clear iterative workflow; its main weaknesses are a redundant Open Loops section, an empty Lessons placeholder, and the lack of a 10% outline template.

Suggestions

Remove or merge the standalone 'Open Loops' section since the 30% template already defines the Open Loops block, and delete the empty 'Lessons' placeholder.

Add a short 10% outline template alongside the 30% one so both depth levels have copy-paste-ready structures.

Consolidate the workflow into a single ordered step list (organize -> present -> quality-check -> iterate -> assess readiness) so the sequence is explicit rather than implied across sections.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the standalone 'Open Loops' section restates the template's Open Loops block and the 'Lessons' section is an empty placeholder, both of which could be trimmed.

3 / 5

Actionability

Provides a copy-paste-ready 30% outline template, concrete iteration dialogue, and explicit quality-check questions; the minor gap is that the 10% outline is described in prose without a matching template.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The organize -> present -> iterate -> complete flow is clear with a feedback loop and quality checks, but the sequence is spread across sections rather than presented as one ordered list, leaving minor sequencing gaps.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A single well-organized file with clear section headers and no bundle files to reference; the inline template is appropriate as the core artifact, with only minor redundancy in the Open Loops treatment.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is clear and distinct, covering both what the skill does and when to invoke it, but it stops at naming the framework rather than enumerating concrete actions and lacks synonyms for natural trigger phrases.

Suggestions

List the concrete actions the skill performs (e.g., 'draft a 10% skeleton or a full 30% outline, surface open loops, and assess draft readiness') to lift specificity.

Add natural-language trigger synonyms such as 'outline', 'structure', or 'plan the piece' alongside '/cw-outline' so the description matches phrasings users actually say.

Broaden the 'when' clause beyond two conditions, e.g. 'Use when organizing interview material before drafting, or when the writer wants to approve structure before prose.'

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('interview material') and 1-2 concrete actions ('Organize ... into a detailed structure', 'using the 10%/30% framework'), but coverage is not comprehensive — no enumeration of the distinct actions a 10% vs 30% outline entails.

3 / 5

Completeness

Clearly answers 'what' (organize interview material into a detailed structure via the 10%/30% framework) and gives an explicit 'when' ('Invoke with /cw-outline or after completing an interview'), but the trigger conditions are limited to two and could be more specific.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes some relevant natural terms ('interview material', 'outline', 'after completing an interview') plus the slash command, but misses common synonyms a user might say such as 'structure', 'draft outline', or 'plan the piece'.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The '10%/30% framework' framing and interview-to-outline niche are mostly distinct with low conflict risk, though 'outline' and 'interview material' could overlap slightly with general writing/structuring skills.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

EveryInc/compound-writing

Path

skills/cw-outline/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.