Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable orchestration skill with a clear multi-step workflow and confirmation checkpoint. Its weaker spots are conciseness (the long worked example pads the token budget) and progressive disclosure (heavy inlining of catalog/example content with no bundle files to offload it).
Suggestions
Move the large worked example session and/or the reviewer catalog and default-panel tables into a reference file (e.g. references/panel-examples.md) and link to it from SKILL.md, improving both conciseness and progressive disclosure.
Trim the example session to the minimum needed to show the propose-confirm-run-synthesize loop, or mark it as a skippable reference, to reduce token cost.
If the single referenced file (../../references/context-contract.md) is part of the skill's bundle, ensure it ships alongside the skill; if it lives in a shared parent, note that dependency explicitly so navigation is unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and assumes Claude's competence (no concept re-explanation), but the ~120-line worked example session is long and somewhat padded relative to the guidance it illustrates, and template blocks repeat structure already shown. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, executable guidance — explicit reviewer table with subagent types, a proposed-panel template, a synthesizer prompt template, and a spawning pattern — with only minor gaps (e.g., exact subagent invocation syntax varies by runtime). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five-step flow (Load Context → Propose Panel → Run Reviewers → Synthesize → Return) is clearly sequenced with an explicit confirmation checkpoint before running and an error-handling section; it lacks a formal validation feedback loop but the operations are advisory rather than destructive/batch, so no 3-cap applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is reasonable with clear section headers and a single one-level-deep reference to ../../references/context-contract.md, but no references/scripts/assets bundle exists, so most detail (reviewer catalog, default panels, full worked example) is inlined in SKILL.md rather than split out, leaving organization only moderate. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |