Diagnose whether writing matches the active writer, project, publication, and platform voice context, then offer a closer revision. Use when the user asks whether text sounds like them, feels generic, or has drifted from an established voice.
67
80%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Passed
No findings from the security scan
Evaluate the passage against the voice context that actually governs the assignment.
Read ../../references/context-contract.md, then load the relevant maintained voice and style sources it identifies.
Use this authority order for voice work:
VOICE.md files.STYLE.md and more specific guides.examples/ folder.TASTE.md, only when the project still maintains it.Name the sources used in the assessment. Do not treat plugin defaults as the writer's identity.
Check for:
Preserve intentional rule-breaking when it carries the writer's point of view. Treat examples as evidence for voice rules, not a corpus to imitate.
Provide:
Do not turn the result into a generic style checklist. The test is whether this piece sounds like this writer in this context.
18702f0
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.