Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence with no padding or explanation of known concepts ("Install @convex-dev/agent + @convex-dev/ai-sdk-provider; add the agent component to convex.config.ts"). A minor deduction applies for the inline time-sensitive version pin "(needs convex 1.45+ on a Convex Cloud deployment, paid plan)" which is not placed in a deprecated/old-patterns section; otherwise this would be a 5.

Actionability

It names exact packages, the config file, and the `convexGateway("provider/model")` call, but contains zero executable code or commands — no install command, no agent-definition snippet, no thread-creation or embedding example. This matches anchor 3 ('Some concrete guidance but incomplete... missing key details') rather than 4's 'concrete code or commands with minor gaps'.

Workflow Clarity

The Workflow section lists a clear 5-step sequence, but there are no validation checkpoints (e.g., confirming the component registered or testing a streamed message), and steps like "Create threads + stream messages; persist history in Convex" compress multiple actions. This matches anchor 3 ('Steps listed but validation gaps; checkpoints missing or implicit'). The destructive/batch cap does not apply since this is an additive integration task.

Progressive Disclosure

The body is under 50 lines with well-organized Workflow and Rules sections, and no bundle files exist, so per the simple-skill note it could approach 5. However, the topic (agent API, RAG vector-index setup, env micro power) is complex enough that one-line compressed steps would benefit from one-level-deep reference files, matching anchor 4 ('Good structure... minor organization gaps').

Specificity

The description names the domain and a concrete package ("Add an AI agent / RAG backend (@convex-dev/agent) to the Convex app") but lists only one action. It matches anchor 3 ('Names domain and 1-2 concrete actions, but not comprehensive'); it is not 4 because capabilities like durable threads, tool calls, or vector search are absent from the description.

Completeness

It has a clear 'what' (add an AI agent / RAG backend via @convex-dev/agent to a Convex app) but no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which per the judging guidelines caps completeness at 3. It is not 2 because the 'what' is specific and unambiguous.

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural terms users would say ("AI agent", "RAG", "Convex") but misses common variations and synonyms such as chatbot, assistant, LLM chat, vector search, or embeddings. This matches anchor 3 ('Some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms') rather than 4's 'good keyword coverage'.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The phrase "to the Convex app" plus the @convex-dev/agent package name creates a clear niche with low conflict risk, matching anchor 4 ('Mostly distinct; minor overlap risk with closely related skills'). It is not 5 because 'AI agent / RAG backend' without trigger phrasing has minor overlap with generic agent-building skills.