Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with concrete commands, a well-sequenced validated workflow, and strong guardrails for a destructive merge operation; its only real weakness is mild redundancy between the steps and the Guardrails section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes Claude's competence without explaining concepts, but the Guardrails section repeats guidance already stated in the steps and the 6-condition retirement checklist could be tightened, fitting 'efficient with minor over-explanation that could be trimmed'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready CLI commands (e.g. 'openspec status --change "<name>" --json', 'openspec validate --specs'), concrete file paths, and full delta/main spec format examples covering the common merge cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 6-step sequence includes an explicit validation checkpoint (step 5), stop-before-write guards on invalid instruction JSON, and a 6-item retirement checklist with feedback loops, satisfying the top anchor for a destructive/batch operation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is single-file with no bundle references and is well-organized into clearly signaled sections, but at 250+ lines the Delta/Main Spec Format Reference blocks are inlined where a separate reference file could reduce top-level weight. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |