Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured MCP-tool wrapper that tells Claude exactly which tool to call, how to present results, and how to handle missing-baseline/snapshot/no-change states. Its only minor gap is the absence of a concrete tool-call signature.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and every line earns its place (tool name, output format, edge cases); it assumes Claude's competence and explains no background concepts. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It names the exact tool to call (`diff_official_docs`) and specifies output fields plus error branches, but gives no literal call signature with arguments, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple, read-only, single-purpose skill under 50 lines, so the simple-skill exception applies; the edge-case branches (no baseline, no snapshot, no changes) serve as explicit validation checkpoints. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references (no references/scripts/assets bundles exist), and the content is organized into clear sections (Command Template, output list, edge cases). | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |