CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

source-command-update-infos-release

Update the Claude Code Ultimate Guide's CLI release tracking and optionally bump the guide version. Use for 'mets à jour le suivi des releases Claude Code dans le guide', 'synchronise la dernière version CLI avec le landing', or the update-infos-release command. Not for Codex CLI releases, checking installed software updates, writing a generic changelog, or publishing without authorization.

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is an exemplary lean dispatcher skill: a tight three-step workflow with per-step completion checkpoints, explicit authorization gating for destructive effects, and clearly signaled one-level-deep pointers to the files that own the details. The only soft spot is that concrete verification commands and the actual edit steps are delegated rather than even briefly summarized.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and directive with zero padding: a canonical-source note and three numbered steps, each dense with actionable instruction (file paths, scope choices, authorization gates). Nothing explains concepts Claude already knows, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor.

5 / 5

Actionability

The guidance is concrete and executable for an instruction-only skill: exact paths to read in full (`.claude/commands/update-infos-release.md`, `docs/workflows/releases-tracking.md`, `docs/workflows/landing-sync.md`), the generating script, and explicit invariants ("Preserve the product name Claude Code and actual repository paths"). It stops short of fully copy-paste-ready execution because the actual editing steps are delegated to the referenced files, which is a minor gap against the level-5 anchor.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The three steps are clearly sequenced and each ends with an explicit checkpoint ("Done when the repository and bump choice are known", "Done when the current workflow and permitted edits are identified", "Done when the scoped result is verified or the blocking condition is explicit"), with the risky effects (commit, push, publication, deployment) explicitly gated. It sits just below the level-5 anchor because the concrete validation commands (which tests/checks to run) are not specified in the body — they are delegated to the referenced workflow files.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is under 50 lines with no bundle files present (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories), and the pointers it does give are external repository paths that are clearly signaled and one level deep ("Those files own the workflow and RSS source split"). Per the simple-skill scoring note, this well-organized short body with clearly signaled one-level references matches the level-5 anchor.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is highly complete and distinctive, with explicit 'what', 'when', and clear negative boundaries. Its weakness is coverage breadth: it names only two actions and its trigger phrases lean on two French quoted requests plus the command name, missing common English variations and synonyms.

Suggestions

Add natural English trigger phrases alongside the French ones (e.g., 'update the release tracking', 'sync the CLI version with the landing page') so the skill triggers for users who phrase the request in English.

Enumerate the concrete sub-actions (e.g., reading the release RSS source, editing the release-tracking docs, syncing the landing page) to raise capability specificity beyond the current two-action summary.

Consider mentioning the changelog-adjacent term 'release notes' in the trigger list, since users may say 'update the release notes' when they mean this skill.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ("Claude Code Ultimate Guide's CLI release tracking") and two concrete actions ("Update ... CLI release tracking and optionally bump the guide version"), matching the 'names domain and 1-2 concrete actions, but not comprehensive' anchor. It does not list several specific actions (e.g., reading the RSS source, editing the tracking docs, syncing the landing), so it falls short of the level-4 anchor.

3 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers 'what' ("Update ... CLI release tracking and optionally bump the guide version") and 'when' with concrete trigger phrases ("Use for 'mets à jour...', 'synchronise...', or the update-infos-release command"), and adds explicit exclusions. This clearly matches the level-5 anchor; the level-4 anchor's caveat about a less-explicit 'when' does not apply.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Trigger phrases include concrete quoted user requests ("mets à jour le suivi des releases Claude Code dans le guide", "synchronise la dernière version CLI avec le landing") plus the command name, giving some relevant keywords (releases, CLI, version, landing). Common English variations and synonyms ("update the release tracking", "release notes", "CLI version") are missing, which fits the 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations' anchor rather than the good-coverage anchor at 4.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The skill occupies a clear niche (this specific guide's CLI release tracking) with distinct triggers, and the explicit exclusion list ("Not for Codex CLI releases, checking installed software updates, writing a generic changelog, or publishing without authorization") minimizes wrong-skill triggering. This matches the level-5 anchor; no meaningful overlap risk is apparent.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 1 missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-ultimate-guide

Path

.agents/skills/source-command-update-infos-release/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.