source-command-update-infos-release

Update Codex releases tracking (guide + landing + version bump)

Quality

64%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.agents/skills/source-command-update-infos-release/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a highly actionable, well-sequenced release workflow with strong validation and error-recovery feedback loops. Its main weaknesses are conciseness (duplicated examples and embedded version-specific boilerplate) and a monolithic structure with no progressive disclosure into separate reference files.

Suggestions

Move the full commit-message templates, summary-output templates, and the Examples section into a separate reference file (e.g., references/templates.md) referenced one level deep, and trim the inlined versions to essentials.

Remove or generalize the embedded time-sensitive version numbers and dates, or relocate them to a clearly marked 'old patterns' section, to avoid penalizing conciseness.

Consolidate the two overlapping Examples into a single concise worked example that illustrates both the CC-only and version-bump paths.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Mostly actionable content, but the duplicated Examples section, verbose commit-message/summary templates, and embedded time-sensitive version numbers (3.9.11, v2.1.15, 2026-01-22) outside any deprecated section add padding, fitting anchor 3.	3 / 5
Actionability	Provides concrete scripts, explicit file lists, exact commit templates, and expected outputs covering common cases, but placeholder gaps (X.Y.Z, [Feature 1]) keep it at anchor 4's "mostly executable; minor gaps" rather than fully copy-paste ready.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clearly sequenced 7-step workflow with explicit validation (step 5 sync check, "fix before committing"), error-recovery feedback loops, and per-step file checklists matches anchor 5; validation is present so the destructive/batch cap does not apply.	5 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	The >50-line SKILL.md is monolithic with all examples, commit templates, and error blocks inlined and no one-level-deep skill-bundle references, matching anchor 3's "some structure but content that should be separate is inline".	3 / 5
	Total	15 / 20 Passed

Description

58%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description concretely identifies the niche and update targets but lacks an explicit "Use when..." trigger clause, capping completeness and trigger quality. It is specific and distinctive for its narrow domain yet would benefit from natural user-facing trigger phrasing.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming the trigger scenarios (e.g., 'Use when the user asks to run /update-infos-release or to update Codex release tracking and bump the guide version').

Include natural trigger terms and synonyms a user would actually say (e.g., 'Codex release notes', 'track new CC versions', 'bump guide version').

Expand the verb set beyond the single 'Update' to distinct actions (e.g., 'Track new Codex releases, bump the guide version, sync landing badge and releases section') to push specificity toward 5.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain ("Update Codex releases tracking") and several specific update targets ("guide + landing + version bump"), matching anchor 4's "several specific actions; minor gaps" rather than anchor 3's single-pair actions.	4 / 5
Completeness	Clearly states the "what" but has no "Use when..." clause or equivalent trigger guidance, so per the rubric cap it stays at anchor 3 (clear what, when missing/weakly implied).	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Contains relevant keywords ("Codex releases", "version bump", "guide", "landing") but misses common variations and natural user phrasing, fitting anchor 3's "some relevant keywords but missing common variations".	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Occupies a clear niche (Codex releases tracking for a specific guide+landing project) with minor overlap risk against generic release/version skills, matching anchor 4 rather than anchor 5 which requires explicit distinct trigger phrases.	4 / 5
	Total	14 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-ultimate-guide
Path: .agents/skills/source-command-update-infos-release/SKILL.md
Commit: e828d7f

Reviewed: 3 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.