Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable body with explicit templates, a mandatory checkpoint, and a validation checklist. Its main defect is that the referenced templates/feedback-draft.md — the sole bundle reference and the spec for one of the four required output files — is missing, and there is a minor checkpoint/save ordering inconsistency.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced templates/feedback-draft.md inside the skill bundle (or inline the three feedback-draft message formats directly in the body) so the fourth output file has a real, reachable spec.
Reconcile the checkpoint ordering: the numbered overview lists CHECKPOINT (step 7) before saving files (step 8), while the CHECKPOINT section says to display it after generating and saving the 4 files — pick one order and state it consistently.
Trim the advisory Tips section and the "What this skill does" recap (which duplicates the frontmatter description) to tighten token usage.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it is almost entirely format templates, rules, and checklists rather than explanations. Minor trimmable padding remains: "What this skill does" restates the frontmatter description, and the Tips section is advisory rather than operational, so it does not fully reach the every-token-earns-its-place anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-shaped guidance: full markdown format templates for angles/titre/descriptions, explicit input/output paths, a ready-to-display CHECKPOINT block, an anti-patterns list, and a validation checklist. However the fourth output file's spec is delegated to "Peer feedback formats: [`templates/feedback-draft.md`](templates/feedback-draft.md)" ("Feedback draft generated from template"), and that file is not present in the bundle, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 8-step sequence ("Reads inputs" → generate → recommend → "CHECKPOINT" → "Saves 4 files") is clear with an explicit mandatory checkpoint and a validation checklist. A minor inconsistency: the numbered list places CHECKPOINT at step 7 before saving at step 8, while the CHECKPOINT section says to display it "After generating and saving the 4 files" — a small sequencing ambiguity, plus the missing feedback template is a validation-adjacent gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized with clearly signaled Templates and Related links, but the skill's only bundle-level content reference — "Peer feedback formats: [`templates/feedback-draft.md`](templates/feedback-draft.md)" — points to a file that does not exist in the bundle (no references/, scripts/, assets/, or templates/ directories are present), so navigation to a key deliverable's spec is broken and its content must be inferred. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |