Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A thoroughly structured, actionable skill body with complete output templates, explicit construction rules, and a validation checklist. Main gaps are the missing referenced template file and inline-heavy format specs that limit progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Ensure templates/kimi-prompt-template.md actually exists in the bundle, or remove/inlined the reference so the skill is self-contained.
Consider moving the lengthy pitch.md and slides.md format specifications into separate reference files linked from the body to reduce inline bulk.
Add explicit per-step validation (e.g., after building the pitch, verify act timing before proceeding to the slide spec) to tighten the workflow checkpoints.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is well-organized and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows; the large inline format templates are necessary output specs but make the file longer than strictly minimal, keeping it just short of fully lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Full copy-paste-ready markdown templates for all three deliverables plus explicit rules ('1 idea per slide', 'add 10% buffer') and step-by-step Kimi usage give concrete guidance, with placeholders left intentionally for fill-in. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 6-step 'What This Skill Does' sequence, explicit Stage 4 prerequisite, placeholder-verification step, and end-of-stage validation checklist provide a clear sequence with most checkpoints present, though inter-step validation is implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear sectioning with one well-signaled one-level-deep reference (the Kimi template link) and Related-skills links; however the cited templates/kimi-prompt-template.md is not present in the bundle and the large inline output-format specs could arguably be externalized. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |