Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-organized body whose format specifications and validation checklist leave Claude knowing exactly what to produce. The main defects are a missing referenced bundle file (the Kimi template), duplicated placeholder-verification guidance, and the absence of error-recovery loops for failed validations or missing upstream inputs.
Suggestions
Ship 'templates/kimi-prompt-template.md' inside the skill bundle (or correct the path) — the body's step 2 depends on loading it, but the file is absent, leaving the Kimi prompt generation unexecutable.
Move the full pitch.md and slides.md format skeletons into reference files (e.g., 'references/pitch-format.md' and 'references/slides-format.md') and keep only a compact summary in SKILL.md, trimming the duplicated '{PLACEHOLDER}' verification to one location.
Add an error-recovery branch to the workflow: what to do when an upstream Stage 4 file is missing or the validation checklist fails (fix → re-validate), so the sequence has a genuine feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with purposeful content — format skeletons, construction rules, anti-patterns, and a checklist — with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Minor trims are possible: the '{PLACEHOLDER}' verification is stated twice (in the kimi-prompt.md section and again in step 2 of 'Using the Kimi prompt'), and the Tips section edges toward editorial commentary. Anchor 4 (efficient with minor over-explanation) fits better than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill the guidance is fully executable: copy-paste-ready markdown skeletons for all three deliverables, exact input/output file naming, a 6-step 'What this skill does' sequence, numbered Kimi usage steps, and a concrete refinement example ('Slide 7: make the number larger, remove the bullet list.'). This matches the top anchor's 'specific examples cover the common cases'. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 6-step sequence is clear and backed by a validation checklist plus an explicit 'Verify no {PLACEHOLDER} remains' checkpoint before handoff. It falls short of anchor 5 because there are no error-recovery feedback loops — e.g., what to do when an upstream Stage 4 file or the Kimi template is missing is left unspecified. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-sectioned and references are clearly signaled, but the referenced 'templates/kimi-prompt-template.md' does not exist in the skill bundle, breaking the skill's own step 2 ('Loads the Kimi template'), and the two large inlined format templates (~100 lines of pitch.md/slides.md skeletons) are content that could live in separate reference files. This matches anchor 3 (organization present but a real structural defect) rather than 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |