talk-stage6-revision
Produces revision sheets with quick navigation by act, a master concept-to-URL table, Q&A cheat-sheet with 6-10 anticipated questions, glossary, and external resources list. Use when preparing for a talk with Q&A, creating shareable reference material for attendees, or building a safety-net glossary for live delivery.
66
81%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
85%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong description that clearly articulates specific deliverables and provides explicit trigger conditions via a 'Use when...' clause. The main weakness is that trigger terms could be broader to capture more natural user phrasings like 'presentation prep' or 'speaker notes'. The description uses proper third-person voice and is concise without being padded.
Suggestions
Expand trigger terms to include common synonyms users might say, such as 'presentation prep', 'speaker notes', 'study guide', 'conference preparation', or 'briefing document'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'quick navigation by act', 'master concept-to-URL table', 'Q&A cheat-sheet with 6-10 anticipated questions', 'glossary', and 'external resources list'. These are detailed, tangible deliverables. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (produces revision sheets with navigation, concept table, Q&A cheat-sheet, glossary, resources) and 'when' with an explicit 'Use when...' clause covering three distinct trigger scenarios: preparing for a talk, creating shareable reference material, and building a safety-net glossary for live delivery. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes some natural terms like 'revision sheets', 'Q&A', 'glossary', 'talk', 'attendees', and 'reference material', but misses common variations users might say such as 'presentation prep', 'speaker notes', 'study guide', 'cheat sheet', or 'conference'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The combination of talk/presentation revision sheets, act-based navigation, anticipated Q&A, and live delivery context creates a very specific niche that is unlikely to conflict with general document or presentation skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted skill that provides highly actionable, concrete guidance for producing revision sheets. Its greatest strength is the detailed output template with exact formatting rules, construction constraints, and a thorough validation checklist. The main weakness is moderate verbosity — some sections are redundant (the numbered process list vs. the template itself), and the inline output template is quite long, though this is partially justified by the complexity of the deliverable.
Suggestions
Remove or condense the 'What This Skill Does' 8-step list since the output format template already makes the process self-evident.
Consider moving the full output format template to a separate TEMPLATE.md file and keeping only a condensed structural overview inline to improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is fairly well-structured but includes some unnecessary verbosity — the 'What This Skill Does' numbered list largely duplicates the output format section, and the 'Tips' section explains obvious rationale. The output template is extensive but justified given the complexity of the deliverable. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides a fully concrete, copy-paste-ready output template with exact markdown structure, specific file naming conventions, precise formatting rules (e.g., metrics in code blocks, one per line with units), and clear construction rules for each section. Claude can execute this without ambiguity. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 8-step process is clearly sequenced, inputs and outputs are explicitly named with file path patterns, and there's a comprehensive validation checklist with specific checkpoints (cross-check master table against pitch concepts, verify URLs, minimum 6 Q&A questions). The anti-patterns section adds error prevention guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill references related stages (Stage 5, Orchestrator) with relative links, which is good. However, the output format template is very long inline (~100 lines) and could potentially be split into a separate reference file. For a skill of this complexity, the single-file approach makes the document quite long but is still navigable due to clear section headers. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
- Commit
60a4372
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.