CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

talk-stage6-revision

Produces revision sheets with quick navigation by act, a master concept-to-URL table, Q&A cheat-sheet with 6-10 anticipated questions, glossary, and external resources list. Use when preparing for a talk with Q&A, creating shareable reference material for attendees, or building a safety-net glossary for live delivery.

67

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a strong, highly actionable skill that provides a complete, concrete output template with clear construction rules and validation steps. Its main weakness is length — the extensive inline template makes the file long, though the content is well-organized. The validation checklist and anti-patterns demonstrate good workflow awareness for a document-generation task.

Suggestions

Consider extracting the full output format template into a separate reference file (e.g., TEMPLATE.md) and keeping only a condensed summary in SKILL.md to improve conciseness and progressive disclosure.

Remove the 'What This Skill Does' numbered list since it largely duplicates information already conveyed by the output format and construction rules sections.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is fairly well-structured but includes some unnecessary verbosity. The 'What This Skill Does' numbered list largely duplicates the output format section. The tips section adds some value but could be trimmed. The output format template is long but justified given the complexity of the deliverable.

2 / 3

Actionability

The skill provides a fully concrete, copy-paste-ready output template with exact markdown structure, table formats, and placeholder patterns. Construction rules give specific constraints (6-10 questions, 20-second oral answers, 10 words max for glossary). Input/output file paths are explicit. Anti-patterns provide clear guardrails.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The 8-step process in 'What This Skill Does' is clearly sequenced. The validation checklist at the end provides explicit verification checkpoints including cross-checking the master table against pitch concepts and verifying URLs. Anti-patterns serve as additional guardrails against common failure modes.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is a single monolithic file at ~170 lines, with the output format template consuming roughly half the content. While the sections are well-organized with clear headers, the extensive inline template could potentially be split into a separate reference file. The 'Related' section provides clear one-level-deep navigation to prerequisite skills.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

85%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a strong description that clearly articulates specific deliverables and explicit trigger conditions. The 'what' is well-defined with five concrete outputs, and the 'when' clause covers three distinct use cases. The main weakness is that trigger terms could be broader to capture more natural user phrasings like 'presentation prep' or 'speaker notes'.

Suggestions

Expand trigger terms to include common variations like 'presentation prep', 'speaker notes', 'conference preparation', or 'talk preparation' to improve discoverability.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: revision sheets with quick navigation by act, master concept-to-URL table, Q&A cheat-sheet with 6-10 anticipated questions, glossary, and external resources list. These are highly specific deliverables.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both what (produces revision sheets, concept-to-URL table, Q&A cheat-sheet, glossary, external resources) and when (preparing for a talk with Q&A, creating shareable reference material, building a safety-net glossary for live delivery) with an explicit 'Use when' clause.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes some natural terms like 'revision sheets', 'Q&A', 'glossary', 'talk', 'attendees', and 'reference material', but misses common variations users might say such as 'presentation prep', 'speaker notes', 'cheat sheet', 'study guide', or 'conference'.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Highly distinctive with a clear niche: talk/presentation revision materials with specific deliverables like act-based navigation, concept-to-URL tables, and anticipated Q&A. Unlikely to conflict with generic document or presentation skills.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Repository
FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-ultimate-guide
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.