talk-stage6-revision

Produces revision sheets with quick navigation by act, a master concept-to-URL table, Q&A cheat-sheet with 6-10 anticipated questions, glossary, and external resources list. Use when preparing for a talk with Q&A, creating shareable reference material for attendees, or building a safety-net glossary for live delivery.

Quality

—

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

—

No eval scenarios have been run

Securityby

Passed

No known issues

Quality

Content

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

Actionable and clearly sequenced with a strong validation checklist, but the body is long and monolithic: a large inline output template and some restated content limit conciseness and progressive disclosure.

Suggestions

Move the full output-format template into a references file (e.g. references/revision-template.md) and keep SKILL.md as a lean overview with a one-level link to it.

Tighten the 'What This Skill Does' step list so it does not restate the deliverables already named in the description.

Trim placeholder repetition inside the template (e.g. the repeated '[Repeat for each act]' / '[Q2 through Q{n}]' blocks) to reduce token weight.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Mostly efficient and free of concept-explanation padding, but the body carries a large inline output template (~135 lines) plus some restated deliverables that could be tightened.	2 / 3
Actionability	Provides a concrete, copy-paste-ready output template with explicit table schemas, file paths, and precise rules (e.g. '6 questions minimum, 10 maximum', units required on metrics).	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	An explicit 8-step sequence is paired with a validation checklist and construction rules/anti-patterns that act as checkpoints for the generation task.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	Sections are well-organized, but with no bundle files the skill is a single monolithic SKILL.md whose large output template is inline and could be split into a referenced file.	2 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that names concrete deliverables and pairs them with explicit, natural 'Use when' triggers. It is concise, distinctive, and free of fluff.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple concrete deliverables (quick navigation by act, master concept-to-URL table, Q&A cheat-sheet with 6-10 questions, glossary, external resources list) rather than vague actions.	3 / 3
Completeness	Explicitly states what it produces and includes a clear 'Use when...' clause with multiple concrete triggers, answering both what and when.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Natural trigger phrasing covers several real-user scenarios ('preparing for a talk with Q&A', 'creating shareable reference material for attendees', 'building a safety-net glossary for live delivery').	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Targets a narrow talk-revision/Q&A-prep niche with distinctive triggers, making it unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Validation

87%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning
relative_links	Relative link issues: 2 suspicious	Warning

	Total	14 / 16 Passed

Repository: FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-ultimate-guide
Commit: eb4fbbd

Reviewed: 2 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.