talk-stage6-revision
Produces revision sheets with quick navigation by act, a master concept-to-URL table, Q&A cheat-sheet with 6-10 anticipated questions, glossary, and external resources list. Use when preparing for a talk with Q&A, creating shareable reference material for attendees, or building a safety-net glossary for live delivery.
83
81%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
85%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong description that clearly articulates specific deliverables and provides explicit 'Use when' triggers. The main weakness is that trigger terms could be broader to capture more natural user phrasings (e.g., 'presentation', 'speaker notes', 'conference prep'). Overall, it is well-structured, distinctive, and uses appropriate third-person voice.
Suggestions
Expand trigger terms to include common synonyms like 'presentation prep', 'speaker notes', 'conference', 'study guide', or 'cheat sheet' to improve discoverability.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'quick navigation by act', 'master concept-to-URL table', 'Q&A cheat-sheet with 6-10 anticipated questions', 'glossary', and 'external resources list'. These are detailed, tangible deliverables. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('produces revision sheets with quick navigation, concept-to-URL table, Q&A cheat-sheet, glossary, external resources') and when ('Use when preparing for a talk with Q&A, creating shareable reference material for attendees, or building a safety-net glossary for live delivery'). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes some natural terms like 'revision sheets', 'Q&A', 'glossary', 'talk', 'attendees', and 'reference material', but misses common variations users might say such as 'presentation prep', 'speaker notes', 'cheat sheet', 'study guide', or 'conference'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive niche combining talk preparation, revision sheets with act-based navigation, and live delivery support. The specific combination of deliverables (concept-to-URL table, anticipated Q&A, glossary for live delivery) makes it unlikely to conflict with other skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a strong, highly actionable skill that provides a complete output template with clear construction rules and validation steps. Its main weakness is moderate verbosity — the 'What This Skill Does' numbered list, 'Tips' section, and some explanatory text could be trimmed since the output format and construction rules already convey the same information. The validation checklist and anti-patterns are excellent additions that ensure quality output.
Suggestions
Remove or condense the 'What This Skill Does' section — the output format template already demonstrates the full workflow, making the 8-step summary redundant.
Merge the 'Tips' section into the construction rules as brief inline notes, since they add context but consume tokens on guidance Claude can infer from the template.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is fairly well-structured but includes some unnecessary explanation (e.g., the 'Tips' section explains obvious benefits, and the 'What This Skill Does' section largely duplicates what the output format already shows). The output template is extensive but justified given the complexity of the deliverable. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides a complete, copy-paste-ready output template with exact markdown structure, specific file naming conventions, concrete construction rules (e.g., '6 questions minimum, 10 maximum'), and clear formatting requirements (e.g., metrics in code blocks with units). Claude can execute this without ambiguity. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 8-step process is clearly sequenced, inputs and outputs are explicitly defined with file paths, and there's a comprehensive validation checklist at the end covering all critical outputs. Anti-patterns serve as additional guardrails against common failure modes. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single long file (~180 lines) with the full output template inline. While the template needs to be here for reference, the construction rules, anti-patterns, and tips could potentially be more tightly integrated. The related links to other stages are well-signaled but the document itself is somewhat monolithic. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
- Commit
746adc8
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.