talk-stage6-revision
Produces revision sheets with quick navigation by act, a master concept-to-URL table, Q&A cheat-sheet with 6-10 anticipated questions, glossary, and external resources list. Use when preparing for a talk with Q&A, creating shareable reference material for attendees, or building a safety-net glossary for live delivery.
83
81%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
85%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong description that clearly articulates specific deliverables and provides explicit trigger conditions via a 'Use when...' clause. The main weakness is that trigger terms could be broader to capture more natural user phrasings (e.g., 'presentation prep', 'speaker notes', 'study guide'). The description is well-structured, uses third person voice correctly, and carves out a distinct niche.
Suggestions
Expand trigger terms to include common synonyms users might say, such as 'presentation prep', 'speaker notes', 'study guide', 'conference prep', or 'lecture preparation'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'quick navigation by act', 'master concept-to-URL table', 'Q&A cheat-sheet with 6-10 anticipated questions', 'glossary', and 'external resources list'. These are detailed, tangible deliverables. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (produces revision sheets with navigation, concept table, Q&A cheat-sheet, glossary, resources) and 'when' with an explicit 'Use when...' clause covering three distinct trigger scenarios: preparing for a talk, creating shareable reference material, and building a safety-net glossary for live delivery. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes some natural terms like 'revision sheets', 'Q&A', 'glossary', 'talk', 'attendees', and 'reference material', but misses common variations users might say such as 'presentation prep', 'speaker notes', 'study guide', 'cheat sheet', or 'conference'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The combination of talk/presentation revision sheets, act-based navigation, anticipated Q&A, and live delivery context creates a very specific niche that is unlikely to conflict with general document creation or presentation skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted skill with excellent actionability — the output format is fully specified with concrete table schemas, construction rules, and anti-patterns. The workflow is clear with a good validation checklist. The main weakness is that the extensive inline template makes the file long; splitting the template into a referenced file would improve both conciseness and progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Move the full output template to a separate file (e.g., TEMPLATE.md) and reference it from the main skill, keeping only a brief structural overview inline.
Trim the Tips section — these are editorial observations that Claude can infer from the construction rules and audience context.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is fairly well-structured but includes some unnecessary commentary (e.g., the Tips section explains obvious usage patterns, and some descriptions like 'The core deliverable' are editorial rather than instructional). The output template is very long and could potentially be more compact, though much of it is necessary as a format specification. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides a fully concrete output template with exact markdown structure, specific file naming conventions, detailed table schemas, and precise construction rules (e.g., '6 questions minimum, 10 maximum', 'what you'd say orally in 20 seconds max'). Every section has clear, copy-paste-ready formatting guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 8-step process is clearly sequenced, inputs and outputs are explicitly defined with file path patterns, and there's a comprehensive validation checklist at the end covering all critical outputs. Anti-patterns serve as additional guardrails against common errors. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill has good section organization and references related skills (Stage 5, Orchestrator), but the massive output template dominates the file and could be split into a separate TEMPLATE.md or FORMAT.md reference. The inline template makes the skill harder to scan quickly. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
- Commit
4ef3dec
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.