Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured instruction skill with actionable scripts, templates, explicit validation, and clean one-level-deep reference delegation. Its main weakness is conciseness, as grounding and feedback-cycle guidance is restated across sections.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated grounding rules ("Keep every workflow grounded" plus the per-section untrusted-evidence reminders) into a single canonical statement referenced where needed.
Tighten the overlap between "Craft a loop through an interview", "Design the feedback cycle", and "Validate every crafted loop" to reduce restated feedback-cycle language.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body assumes Claude's competence and avoids explaining known concepts, but grounding rules and feedback-cycle guidance recur across several sections, adding length that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides exact routing, a verbatim interview script, a concrete delivery markdown template, a compression guide, and an explicit LOOPS.md field list — concrete and copy-ready rather than abstract. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step process is clearly sequenced (route → workflow → design → validate → deliver) with explicit validation checkpoints such as the silent preflight cycle and approval gating for destructive/external actions. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that delegates each workflow to a one-level-deep, clearly signaled reference (discover.md, audit.md, run.md, debrief.md, publish.md), all verified to exist with no further nesting. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |