Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An efficient, actionable procedure for filing a vercel/ai issue with concrete gh commands and a sensible authorization gate. Could be strengthened with a sample issue-body template and an auth-failure recovery step.
Suggestions
Include a short concrete example of the temporary body-file contents (a minimal markdown skeleton matching the listed sections) so the issue body is copy-paste ready.
Add a one-line recovery branch for step 1, e.g. 'If `gh auth status` fails, run `gh auth login` before continuing.'
Show the literal `--body-file` invocation with a real temp path pattern (e.g. `$(mktemp)` or `issue-body.md`) to remove placeholder ambiguity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean numbered procedure with no concept explanations or padding; every line (auth check, body-file rationale, the gh command, return the URL) earns its place and assumes Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete executable commands are present (`gh auth status`, `gh issue create -R vercel/ai --title "<title>" --body-file <file>`) and sections are enumerated, but no concrete example of the body-file content is shown, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence with checkpoints (`gh auth status` precondition, an explicit authorization gate before the external write), though an explicit error-recovery feedback loop (e.g. what to do if auth fails) is absent. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A simple, under-50-line single-purpose skill with a clear title and well-organized numbered steps and no need for external references, satisfying the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |