Content
62%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill has a well-sequenced workflow with explicit validation and a feedback loop, and it correctly offloads framework fixes to a reference file. It is weakened by inline checklist tables that duplicate an unlinked reference and by padding (diagrams and capability tables) that inflate token cost.
Suggestions
Reference references/visual-checklist.md from the Step 2 inspection section and move the inline 'Inspection Items' tables there instead of duplicating them in the body.
Trim the decorative mermaid diagrams and the 'Required Capabilities'/'Other Compatible Browser Automation Tools' tables, or move them to a reference, to reduce token overhead.
Add one concrete executable check in the body (e.g., a Playwright snippet to capture the four viewports or a console snippet to detect overflow) so the core workflow is actionable rather than a checklist of issues to look for.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body assumes Claude's intelligence (no over-explanation of what a website is) but is padded with decorative mermaid diagrams and organizational tables (Scope of Application, Required Capabilities, Other Compatible Browser Automation Tools) that don't add action value, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Some concrete specifics exist (viewport widths 375/768/1280/1920, MCP config JSON, Playwright tool names, file-pattern globs), but the core inspection guidance is presented as abstract 'issues to look for' tables rather than executable checks or code in the body itself. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence (Information Gathering → Visual Inspection → Issue Fixing → Re-verification) with an explicit feedback loop back to Step 2, before/after screenshot comparison, regression testing, and an iteration limit that escalates to the user after 3 attempts. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Only one of two reference files is signaled from the body (references/framework-fixes.md); the existing visual-checklist.md is never linked, and inline inspection-item tables duplicate content that should be externalized to it. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |