Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is exceptionally concise and well-structured with a clear phase sequence and exit checklist, but it stays at a structural level without executable per-phase guidance. Adding concrete steps or examples for each phase would raise actionability.
Suggestions
For each phase, add 1-2 concrete actions or example commands (e.g., how 'explore' gathers findings, what 'verify' runs) to move from structure to execution.
Add an explicit per-phase validation checkpoint (e.g., 'Exit explore when findings + risks are documented') to complement the final Exit Criteria checklist.
Optionally link to a reference file with phase-by-phase templates so the SKILL.md stays lean while providing depth.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean set of bullet lists and a checklist with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It names concrete phases and per-phase artifacts plus exit criteria, but gives no executable steps, commands, or specifics on how to perform each phase, fitting the 'some concrete guidance but incomplete' anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five phases are clearly numbered in canonical order with a 'Never skip a phase' guard and an Exit Criteria checklist acting as checkpoints, but per-phase validation is only implied rather than explicit, leaving minor gaps below anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no external references needed and well-organized into clearly headed sections (When to Use, Phase Order, Artifacts, Exit Criteria), matching the simple-skill exception for a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |