Create Gentle AI pull requests with issue-first checks. Trigger: creating, opening, or preparing PRs for review.
57
64%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./internal/assets/skills/branch-pr/SKILL.mdUse this skill when:
Before any target-host read, obtain explicit authorization for the remote destination (exact target), operation and credential/session; do not probe ambient credentials. Once authorized, reuse fresh target-bound approved issue, default branch, type-label and current check evidence. Commit, push, PR, merge, chain strategy/exception and native RDD consent remain human-owned.
Closes/Fixes/Resolves #N closes it on merge; Refs #N is non-closing; malformed, cross-repository, and mixed closing/non-closing references for the same issue are rejectedtype:* label. A current direct human instruction for the exact target/action and verified target-host capability are required before its canonical issue-creation workflow mutation; mark checkboxes only after readback.1. After remote read authorization, verify the base-repository issue has `status:approved` and resolve the target's current default/base branch; reuse fresh target-bound evidence
2. Ask the human to select closing (`Closes/Fixes/Resolves #N`) vs non-closing (`Refs #N`) intent; preserve the human-selected choice
3. Implement authorized work; run applicable local checks and report failures honestly
4. Draft the template; do not auto commit, push, create a PR, merge or grant native RDD consent
5. Apply a type label only under the canonical issue-creation action contract
6. Read target policy and status to identify REQUIRED checks; do not infer requiredness from a pending optional runBranch names MUST match this regex:
^(feat|fix|chore|docs|style|refactor|perf|test|build|ci|revert)\/[a-z0-9._-]+$Format: type/description — lowercase, no spaces, only a-z0-9._- in description.
| Type | Branch pattern | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Feature | feat/<description> | feat/user-login |
| Bug fix | fix/<description> | fix/zsh-glob-error |
| Chore | chore/<description> | chore/update-ci-actions |
| Docs | docs/<description> | docs/installation-guide |
| Style | style/<description> | style/format-scripts |
| Refactor | refactor/<description> | refactor/extract-shared-logic |
| Performance | perf/<description> | perf/reduce-startup-time |
| Test | test/<description> | test/add-setup-coverage |
| Build | build/<description> | build/update-shellcheck |
| CI | ci/<description> | ci/add-branch-validation |
| Revert | revert/<description> | revert/broken-setup-change |
Use the current .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md as the body authority, including all required sections. The items below are schematic guidance, not a complete ready-to-publish body; never precheck unsupported claims:
<human-selected Closes/Fixes/Resolves #N or Refs #N>Valid keywords: Closes #N, Fixes #N, Resolves #N (case insensitive) close the issue on merge; Refs #N is a non-closing link. Use only visible, well-formed references to approved issues in the base repository.
The linked issue MUST have the status:approved label.
Check exactly ONE in the template and add the matching label:
| Checkbox | Label to add |
|---|---|
| Bug fix | type:bug |
| New feature | type:feature |
| Documentation only | type:docs |
| Code refactoring | type:refactor |
| Maintenance/tooling | type:chore |
| Breaking change | type:breaking-change |
1-3 bullet points of what the PR does.
| File | Change |
|------|--------|
| `path/to/file` | What changed |- [ ] Scripts run without errors: `shellcheck scripts/*.sh` (check only if run and passed)
- [ ] Manually tested the affected functionality (check only if observed)
- [ ] Skills load correctly in target agent (check only if verified)Mark boxes only with observed evidence; leave pending actions unchecked and describe them. An unchecked required gate is not merge-ready:
type:* label (confirmed by target-host readback)Co-Authored-By trailers| Check | Job name | What it verifies |
|---|---|---|
| PR Validation | Check Issue Reference | Body contains a visible, well-formed base-repository Closes/Fixes/Resolves #N or Refs #N |
| PR Validation | Check Issue Has status:approved | Linked issue has status:approved |
| PR Validation | Check PR Has type:* Label | PR has exactly one type:* label |
| CI | Shellcheck | Shell scripts pass shellcheck |
Commit messages MUST match this regex:
^(build|chore|ci|docs|feat|fix|perf|refactor|revert|style|test)(\([a-z0-9\._-]+\))?!?: .+Format: type(scope): description or type: description
type — required, one of: build, chore, ci, docs, feat, fix, perf, refactor, revert, style, test(scope) — optional, lowercase with a-z0-9._-! — optional, indicates breaking changedescription — required, starts after : Type-to-label mapping:
| Commit type | PR label |
|---|---|
feat | type:feature |
fix | type:bug |
docs | type:docs |
refactor | type:refactor |
chore | type:chore |
style | type:chore |
perf | type:feature |
test | type:chore |
build | type:chore |
ci | type:chore |
revert | type:bug |
feat! / fix! | type:breaking-change |
Examples:
feat(scripts): add Codex support to setup.sh
fix(skills): correct topic key format in sdd-apply
docs(readme): update multi-model configuration guide
refactor(skills): extract shared persistence logic
chore(ci): add shellcheck to PR validation workflow
perf(scripts): reduce setup.sh execution time
style(skills): fix markdown formatting
test(scripts): add setup.sh integration tests
ci(workflows): add branch name validation
revert: undo broken setup change
feat!: redesign skill loading systemDo not assume main or execute branch/remote mutations from examples. Resolve the authorized target's default branch from current metadata first. For protected status:approved or size:exception, require authenticated actor target-host viewerPermission MAINTAIN or ADMIN and a current direct human instruction binding the exact target/action; do not demand separate proof of the instruction-giver's identity. A human-selected size:exception additionally requires documented over-budget rationale. Baseline attribution requires reproducing the same failing command/environment on a comparable isolated clean base, without disturbing user changes; otherwise report baseline unverified. Never stash/pop for this purpose.
d96a5d4
Also appears in
last in sync Jul 24, 2026
last in sync Jul 24, 2026
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.