Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured contract: dense hard rules with concrete commands and fail-loudly guards, a sequenced execution workflow with validation, and clean sectioning. The only soft spot is the absence of an explicit validate-fix-retry loop, which keeps workflow clarity at 4.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and dense — Hard Rules each state a precise constraint with zero concept-explanation padding (no 'what a journey is' filler), and every line carries a specific guard or command, matching the 'lean, every token earns its place' anchor rather than the 4-anchor which still tolerates minor trimmable explanation. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-able commands appear throughout (`go test ./bench`, `gentle-ai-bench run --binary ...`, `--only <journey-id>`, `.github/workflows/ci.yml`), with named guards (collision, dead-execute) — mostly executable guidance, but `--binary ...` is a template and the exact build command is deferred to 'copy CI', the minor gaps that keep it off the fully-copy-paste 5-anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Execution Steps give a clear 4-step sequence with a validation checkpoint (run `go test ./...` for declarations THEN the driven harness; both results in the PR body) plus named fail-loudly guards, fitting the 'clear sequence with most checkpoints' anchor; it stays at 4 rather than 5 because the error-recovery feedback loop is only implicit, not an explicit validate-fix-retry cycle. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the body is well under 50 lines with clean, single-level section headers (Activation Contract, Hard Rules, Execution Steps, Output Contract) and no nested references, so the simple-skill exception applies and structure is unambiguous, matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |