Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, well-structured procedural contract with executable gh CLI commands, exact form-materialization tables, and unusually rigorous validation checkpoints (duplicate gate, one-attempt rule, read-back verification, fail-closed result classification). The reference split is clean and one level deep; the main improvement opportunities are consolidating repeated rule statements and scripting the few remaining judgment-call steps (query construction, temp-dir setup, privacy scan).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body contains no explanations of concepts Claude already knows — every section carries procedure, and commands are given without library-education padding. It falls short of anchor 5 because rules are repeated across sections (the label-permission triple appears in both Hard Rules and Approved Catalog Gate, and fail-closed/one-attempt rules are restated several times), which could be consolidated. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete copy-paste-ready commands are provided for every mutation and read (gh api labels enumeration, gh issue list/view/create/comment with file redirection), plus exact per-control body-materialization tables. Minor gaps keep it below anchor 5: the duplicate-search $QUERY construction, temp-directory creation commands, and privacy-scan mechanics are directed but not scripted. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–9 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints throughout a write workflow: a completed duplicate search before any write, exactly one attempt with no blind retry, read-back identity and body comparison from READBACK_FILE, and a terminal confirmed/no_write/unknown classification that fail-closes and stops on uncertainty — a genuine feedback loop for error recovery. This matches the anchor 5 example's validate-before-proceed pattern with checkpoints explicit rather than implicit. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single bundle reference (references/delegated-workflow-actions.md) is real, clearly signaled as normative, referenced at the point of need, and one level deep with no nested references; body sections are well organized with headers, tables, and numbered steps. It stops short of anchor 5 because the 117-line body is a full procedural contract rather than a lean overview — dense material such as the repo-specific catalog rules in Approved Catalog Gate could arguably live in a reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |